sonship has declared my requests for evidence backing some of the claims he makes about himself to be "unbelievably evil". See Thread 182972 midway down page 16.
That example aside, according to your way of thinking, what else that is "unbelievably evil" is going on in this online community?
@fmf saidFirstly a comment on your specific example. I couldn’t find it at a glance and I’m not going to read that entire page of a dozen of sonship’s spam-bomb posts over two feet of screen text in order to do so. There is a psychologically rooted reason that he is drowning that thread of course, I shall take your word that it exists and file it alongside his claims of your “diseased mind” which produces and “spreads faeces” and “germs”.
sonship has declared my requests for evidence backing some of the claims he makes about himself to be "unbelievably evil". See Thread 182972 midway down page 16.
That example aside, according to your way of thinking, what else that is "unbelievably evil" is going on in this online community?
Many of the religious people in this forum are of the mindset that their beliefs come from God and therefore these beliefs are somehow holy, so to challenge them is perceived as an attack on God himself and therefore evil.
10 Nov 19
@fmf saidhyperbolic use of phrases such as “unbelievably evil”
sonship has declared my requests for evidence backing some of the claims he makes about himself to be "unbelievably evil". See Thread 182972 midway down page 16.
That example aside, according to your way of thinking, what else that is "unbelievably evil" is going on in this online community?
10 Nov 19
@divegeester saidYes, that was my feeling. I normally count down the page to find the specific post.
Firstly a comment on your specific example. I couldn’t find it at a glance and I’m not going to read that entire page of a dozen of sonship’s spam-bomb posts over two feet of screen text in order to do so. There is a psychologically rooted reason that he is drowning that thread of course, I shall take your word that it exists and file it alongside his claims of your “di ...[text shortened]... are somehow holy, so to challenge them is perceived as an attack on God himself and therefore evil.
I don't think it is reasonable to label sonship as "unbelieveably evil", "annoying to debate with" is fair comment, but evil is taking things somewhat too far.
10 Nov 19
@fmf saidWell he habitually makes numerous lengthy posts which are all rather long and generally not tremendously readable. It's not clear whether this is because he's deluding himself into believing that people want to read major essays on what in the end is a recreational site, or as a method of stifling debate by setting adversaries a supertask. The net result is that unless I'm given the exact location I'm deterred from trying to find the offending post, because I have to wade through a substantial amount of verbosity.
"Mid way down page 16" is too vague?
10 Nov 19
@fmf saidRight, I think I get it now, you are saying he is accusing you of being "unbelievably evil". This is the footnote to post number 7. The rest is just copy and paste. In post 6 we have this:
sonship has declared my requests for evidence backing some of the claims he makes about himself to be "unbelievably evil". See Thread 182972 midway down page 16.
That example aside, according to your way of thinking, what else that is "unbelievably evil" is going on in this online community?
You may notice that there is one poster here who always tries to goad me to boast. This is his subtle attempt to maneuver me into self bragging. Can you see how very wicked this is?and in the seventh post on that page, the base is:
The next time you see FMF goad and taunt Christians Ie. - "Well how duplicated are you? Well, is living water flowing from you now? Well, have you arrived? Well, are you mature yet? What percentage are you like Jesus?"Yes, he does say that. It's unreasonable.
These are questions designed to entrap believers into boasting in themselves that they MAY be the fallen Laodicea. That is the skeptic is trying to entrap the believer into lukewarmness and self satisfaction. How unbelievably evil is the motive.
I withdraw my comments above, I was confused about your meaning, and hadn't read the OP carefully enough.
@fmf saidWell there was the post where he claimed to be Lucifer and demanded that you sacrifice the virgin Dive to him on an alter of Trump supporters.
sonship has declared my requests for evidence backing some of the claims he makes about himself to be "unbelievably evil". See Thread 182972 midway down page 16.
That example aside, according to your way of thinking, what else that is "unbelievably evil" is going on in this online community?
Other than that, I can't find one thing.
Not to worry though, Dive ensures me he won't go to hell for it.
10 Nov 19
@whodey saidSomething from you that isn't facetious drivel would be more interesting.
Well there was the post where he claimed to be Lucifer and demanded that you sacrifice the virgin Dive to him on an alter of Trump supporters.
Other than that, I can't find one thing.
Not to worry though, Dive ensures me he won't go to hell for it.
10 Nov 19
@deepthought saidFair enough. Just because my reason for writing an OP is fresh and vivid to me at that moment, it doesn't mean that I necessarily craft it in a clear as clear can be kind of way!
I withdraw my comments above, I was confused about your meaning, and hadn't read the OP carefully enough.
10 Nov 19
@deepthought saidNo one is saying sonship is evil nor unbelievably evil, it is sonship who used the phrase.
Yes, that was my feeling. I normally count down the page to find the specific post.
I don't think it is reasonable to label sonship as "unbelieveably evil", "annoying to debate with" is fair comment, but evil is taking things somewhat too far.
10 Nov 19
@deepthought saidOne of the best ways to extinguish a fire is to throw sand on it. This is metaphorically what sonship does when a thread is burning his ass.
Well he habitually makes numerous lengthy posts which are all rather long and generally not tremendously readable. It's not clear whether this is because he's deluding himself into believing that people want to read major essays on what in the end is a recreational site, or as a method of stifling debate by setting adversaries a supertask. The net result is that unless ...[text shortened]... trying to find the offending post, because I have to wade through a substantial amount of verbosity.
10 Nov 19
@whodey saidI wouldn’t have thought that you could fare less well in a forum than you seem to in “Debates”, but you consistently prove me wrong.
Well there was the post where he claimed to be Lucifer and demanded that you sacrifice the virgin Dive to him on an alter of Trump supporters.
Other than that, I can't find one thing.
Not to worry though, Dive ensures me he won't go to hell for it.
10 Nov 19
@whodey saidAsk yourself that question each morning when looking in the bathroom mirror.
I don't understand. How am I to have a conversation with you without facetious drivel? That makes no sense.