Originally posted by deennySo you have NO empirical evidence to substantiate YOUR claim that the Gmans text to
The original claim of harassment was made by Gal 75 and backed by yourself. This should have dealt with by contacting the moderators. They would have been the proper people to deal with this. My own opinion is that questions asked in a public forum about something a poster had written would not be harassment when repeated when not answered. Instead, An abusi ...[text shortened]... call him out on it. The original accusion of harassment not to be backed up was made by Gal 75.
The king of skullduggery FMF was harassment, despite having made the assertion in a
public forum and being asked, by myself to produce it. Fine, its simply a reflection of
all your other ludicrous and i hasten to add, unsubstantiated assertions, including those
of cowardice, abuse or any other adjectives that you seem intent on dreaming up and
implying. Next time, feel your bum before posting, it just may instil in you a sense of
propriety and reality, because simply put, regardless of what you imply, believe,
insinuate, imagine or concoct does not mean that it is necessarily so, just because you
say it is, now be a good flunkie and run off and tell FMF the news, as if he doesn't
already know.
Originally posted by Agergwhy would i send an alert to the moderators? i am not the one being harassed.
I don't doubt for a moment that either of Galveston75, or Robbie Carrobie have sent an alert to the moderators; the thing is, much to their embarrassment and annoyance, they have most likely been ignored. Furthermore, I do doubt Galveston75 has shown the moderators the actual PM he sent you (he is feeble, but not *that* feeble!).
Galveston now finds himself i ...[text shortened]... it go at his beckoning...it is for us, individually, to decide when and if we let it go.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieSo what about your claim that FMF harassed Gal75
So you have NO empirical evidence to substantiate YOUR claim that the Gmans text to
The king of skullduggery FMF was harassment, despite having made the assertion in a
public forum and being asked, by myself to produce it. Fine, its simply a reflection of
all your other ludicrous and i hasten to add, unsubstantiated assertions, including those ...[text shortened]... t is, now be a good flunkie and run off and tell FMF the news, as if he doesn't
already know.
2 edits
Originally posted by deennyI have already produced a definition, here it is again,
So I have to produce empirical evidence when I assert harassment, while the standard for you is "what about it"
Harassment covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is
commonly understood as behaviour intended to disturb or upset, and it is
characteristically repetitive.
Did the Gman perceive that FMF's attention was,
1. disturbing
2, upsetting
3, offensive
4, characterized by repetition
clearly he did, for his requests that FMF that king of skullduggery desist are publicly
documented, resulting in the culmination of a private text to the offensive party and
an appeal to the site moderators.
furthermore did the king of skullduggery desist, no he persisted in harassing the
Gman, across threads, making references to issues which had nothing to with the
context of the thread they were actually discussing, repeatedly ignored his requests
to desist from correspondence and made a nuisance of himself as far as possible in
this regard.
Originally posted by robbie carrobie
[b]I have already produced a definition, here it is again,
Harassment covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is
commonly understood as behaviour intended to disturb or upset, and it is
characteristically repetitive.
Did the Gman perceive that FMF's attention was,
1. disturbing
2, upsetting
3, offensive
4, characte ...[text shortened]... le answering providing further incontrovertible evidence of psychological
attempt at harassment.
1 edit
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe people who decide if FMF was quilty of harassment should be the moderators and as it now seems they were contacted, we await their verdict.
I have already produced a definition, here it is again,
Harassment covers a wide range of behaviours of an offensive nature. It is
commonly understood as behaviour intended to disturb or upset, and it is
characteristically repetitive.
Did the Gman perceive that FMF's attention was,
1. disturbing
2, upsetting
3, offensive
4, characte ...[text shortened]... desist from correspondence and made a nuisance of himself as far as possible in
this regard.
2 edits
Originally posted by deennyalso the content of his texts contained a coercive element, attempting to forcibly coerce
The people who decide if FMF was quilty of harassment should be the moderators and as it now seems they were contacted, we await their verdick.
the Gman into answering questions that he had no interest in or felt uncomfortable in
answering, incontrovertible evidence of harassment of a psychological nature.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs I said we will await the verdict. Interested you fell that Gal75 was uncomfordable answering the questions. Why!!!
also the content of his texts contained a coercive element, attempting to forcibly coerce
the Gman into answering questions that he had no interest in or felt uncomfortable in
answering, incontrovertible evidence of harassment of a psychological nature.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's interesting that you are now suggesting you did not alert the moderators.
why would i send an alert to the moderators? i am not the one being harassed.
What about this: Thread 150006 page 10, 3 posts from the bottom?
robbie: "I have also alerted his posts hopefully he will leave you in peace or he will be forced to do so. Creepy or what?"
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAs far as I am aware, everybody involved in this discussion has seen galveston75's abusive PM. It has been "produced" already.
So you have NO empirical evidence to substantiate YOUR claim that the Gmans text to The king of skullduggery FMF was harassment, despite having made the assertion in a public forum and being asked, by myself to produce it.