Originally posted by RJHinds
You wrote, "The only record this creator ever leaves, is in non-scientific
sources such as the Bible." I was just pointing out that there is sources
that the scientist can examine that the Creator God has left. Archeologist
have discovered many things talked about in the Holy Bible that they can
examine, like the location of Sodom and Gomorrah, the rui ...[text shortened]... where God gave Moses the ten
commandments
http://www.arkdiscovery.com/mt__sinai_found.htm
The existence of the mountain, doesn't prove that on the mountain Moses was spoken to
by a burning bush or was given commandments by an omnipotent god.
In the same way that an ancient boat (and no they haven't found the ark) even one up a
mountain doesn't prove an impossible worldwide flood.
The Shroud of Turin is a medieval forgery, but even if it weren't, the fact that it was once wrapped around a
corpse tells you nothing about whether that corps was later resurrected.
And likewise the empty tomb.
None of these prove that miracles happened 2000 years ago.
The bible doesn't prove any of them either.
The fact that 'some' vague prophecies were fulfilled is recorded in the new testament.
Which was written by people who had full knowledge of what was written in the old testament.
You know this because you have been told this many times.
Yet you still claim what you know fails to meet the standard of evidence let alone proof, as proof.
This is either self delusional, or dishonest, behaviour.
Either way you know such evidence is always going to be rejected,
and with sound rational grounds for doing so.