22 Jun 06
Not just a play on words, Here is what I am. I am at the most a collection of systems that are indepenent and interrelated that work in tamdem to sustain life. With just 1 system failure I cannot exist. My existence is predicated on how other things work in tandem. So that would mean then that I am not the "God" but I am a part of the God within a system that is interdepenent on others actualizing that reality. If my premise is correct, failing to actualize as part of the God system is like living in the grave. God will continue whether I ever understand this truth or not. I will only be ejected from the system and reorganized for future use like a used car part. That's really wild!
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by spiritmangr8nessWhat on earth made you think you're God?
Not just a play on words, Here is what I am. I am at the most a collection of systems that are indepenent and interrelated that work in tamdem to sustain life. With just 1 system failure I cannot exist. My existence is predicated on how other things work in tandem. So that would mean then that I am not the "God" but I am a part of the God within a s ...[text shortened]... cted from the system and reorganized for future use like a used car part. That's really wild!
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by XanthosNZ...order and justice in a world lacking both?
If I AM GOD then What AM I?
A human construct born of superstition and a craving for order and justice in a world lacking both?
No order? What the plague gave you this idea? Aren't you into science and math -- field that presuppose this? Eistein would certainly have disagreed with you.
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by HalitoseThat appears to be just dribble or the ravings of the insane. This is not a plauge but an ontological argument kind sir. Any man who drives a ford is driving it's creator. Is is insane not to see that the creator and the creation are one? What kind of car do you drive? What kind of suit do you wear> I presume, who"s son are you. You know a tree by it;s fruit. Are you a peach or a plum?
[b]...order and justice in a world lacking both?
No order? What the plague gave you this idea? Aren't you into science and math -- field that presuppose this? Eistein would certainly have disagreed with you.[/b]
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by spiritmangr8nessThat appears to be just dribble or the ravings of the insane.
That appears to be just dribble or the ravings of the insane. This is not a plauge but an ontological argument kind sir. Any man who drives a ford is driving it's creator. Is is insane not to see that the creator and the creation are one? What kind of car do you drive? What kind of suit do you wear> I presume, who"s son are you. You know a tree by it;s fruit. Are you a peach or a plum?
Mine or Xanthos'?
This is not a plauge(sic) but an ontological argument kind sir.
Undoubtedly. 🙂
Is is insane not to see that the creator and the creation are one?
This seems to be in direct violation of the law of non-contradiction. The very reason why you call it "creator" is because it is not "creation" (ceteris paribus). Logically, the two concepts are distinct.
23 Jun 06
Originally posted by spiritmangr8nessWould still apply.
This seems to be in direct violation of the law of non-contradiction. The very reason why you call it "creator" is because it is not "creation" (ceteris paribus). Logically, the two concepts are distinct.
How about the architect and, oh let.s say the building😏