Originally posted by kirksey957
Rob, do you find any purpose in the "mystical?" I know that there are some people who meditate to lower their blood pressure and promote a sense of well-being. I'm not arguing for God in this, but rather a tangible outcome of a chosen "higher power."
Mystical experiences do not require any theism, if you include such things as Zen Buddhist satori experiences, for example. The interesting questions, for me, are:
Suppose you have profound experience that seems to lie outside your normal conscious experience—
1) Unless you have a fairly paltry notion of what the mind can do, does that experience necessarily have to originate from outside your own mind (e.g., the unconscious)? And how would you know?
2) If, based on whatever evidence, you decide that it originates from outside your own mind, does that necessarily mean it originates from outside the natural order. And how would you know?
I’m assuming here that the actual content of the experience, if there is any, is not self-validating. That is, if the experience seems to “communicate” something like “I am the god Krishna,” that does not necessarily mean that it is not your unconscious delivering the message.
That is why I think that, although such experiences might be valuable and useful (and may not even have side effects), they always ought to be treated as provisional and subject to question.