Originally posted by amannion
That's not a proof.
It's exactly what I was referring to as circular arguments.
You may as well say to me that a can of coke proves god's existence, or a piece of dirt on my shoe proves god's existence.
Life demonstrating god's existence is simply a bad cliche - like something out of a hallmark card.
I'll give you another chance.
Give me one proof.
I gave you proof that satisfies everything that you asked for. Now you
don't want to believe so you are like a child, who wants to change the
rules. Life is something that man can not explain or reproduce, yet it
exists with the ability to reproduce itself with a computer-like program
so advanced that the best programmers in the world can not come near
to matching it. You can't honestly say it doesn't satisfy the science of
being able to be reproduced and be repeatable. I did not say anything
about God exists because God exists. You know life exists just like
we know electricty exists. I also did not mention any old books of any
kind. So what is the problem? Did you lie to me? You don't seem to
want to play fair. I did not mention anything about something man could
make like a coke can or anything about the creation of the heavens or the
earth or that dirt on your shoes. You don't want circular arguments yet
you are quick to give a strawman argument. Suck it up and admit you are
a liar and never intended to believe in the beginning.