Interfaith agenda

Originally posted by @whodey
It's the witch hunt for offensive language.

For example, in some places in Europe I hear that pastors are not allowed to say that homosexual sex is an abomination to God cuz it is offensive.

What does this have to do with the OP?

Originally posted by @fmf
You are arguing that there is no problem with URI except that Saudis would not be allowed to join it? Be clear.

I'm saying that there is no way in hell that the international community will force Muslims to allow other religions into places like Mecca, but they damn sure will have no problem forcing it on everyone else.

Originally posted by @whodey
I'm saying that there is no way in hell that the international community will force Muslims to allow other religions into places like Mecca, but they damn sure will have no problem forcing it on everyone else.

What does this have to do with URI? Have you even opened their web site and looked to see what they are all about and what they do?

Originally posted by @whodey
Do we want governments pushing a world religion? I say no.

On what basis are you suggesting URI is "a world religion" or, indeed, a "religion" at all? What evidence do you have that there are "governments pushing" URI as a "religion"?

Originally posted by @whodey
I'm saying that there is no way in hell that the international community will force Muslims to allow other religions into places like Mecca, but they damn sure will have no problem forcing it on everyone else.

Here's some info about URI's activities in the Middle East and in North Africa

https://uri.org/region/middle-east-and-north-africa

Which bits of it give you a bad "vibe" and why?

Bump for whodey