Go back
Is it possible to synthesize a virus?

Is it possible to synthesize a virus?

Spirituality

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

I know some people believe scientists will never be able to synthesize life in the lab. Do these people thing scientists will be able to synthesize viruses?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
15 Sep 04
Moves
7051
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I know some people believe scientists will never be able to synthesize life in the lab. Do these people thing scientists will be able to synthesize viruses?
If scientists do, I guess these people will dispute that the virus is not a living thing or that viruses do not have consciousness like us. Either way thay will confuse the issue.

googlefudge

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
Clock
16 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

depends what you mean by synthesise a virus. if you mean build one from scratch from base protines, the yes eventually. if you mean take bits of viruses and put them together to make a new one then it is done all the time.

this isn't really a spiritual question. maybe we need a science forum as we have a spirituality one.

S

Joined
19 Nov 03
Moves
31382
Clock
16 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
depends what you mean by synthesise a virus. if you mean build one from scratch from base protines, the yes eventually. if you mean take bits of viruses and put them together to make a new one then it is done all the time.

this isn't really a spiritual question. maybe we need a science forum as we have a spirituality one.
And duplicate the evolution debates? Are you mad? I don't think my brain could take it....

H
I stink, ergo I am

On the rebound

Joined
14 Jul 05
Moves
4464
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Conrau K
If scientists do, I guess these people will dispute that the virus is not a living thing or that viruses do not have consciousness like us. Either way thay will confuse the issue.
What's to confuse. Define "living". 😛😀

googlefudge

Joined
31 May 06
Moves
1795
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

the evolution debates should stay in the spirituality forum as there is no scientific argument as to whether evolution hapens or not. anyway I have posted the question in site ideas, so the discussion can carry on there.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
depends what you mean by synthesise a virus. if you mean build one from scratch from base protines, the yes eventually. if you mean take bits of viruses and put them together to make a new one then it is done all the time.

this isn't really a spiritual question. maybe we need a science forum as we have a spirituality one.
This belongs here because I am addressing those who think there is some sort of supernatural "life force" which human scientists cannot replicate. These people do exist, right?

7

Jew.

Joined
13 Oct 04
Moves
3938
Clock
16 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

d

Joined
26 May 04
Moves
2221
Clock
18 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

a prion could be made first

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53321
Clock
20 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by googlefudge
the evolution debates should stay in the spirituality forum as there is no scientific argument as to whether evolution hapens or not. anyway I have posted the question in site ideas, so the discussion can carry on there.
You mean 'no scientific evidence' you personally would accept. The vast majority of real scientists would disagree wholeheartedly with you. There are so many volumes of evidence it makes the head spin but you appear not to be one of those able to accept such evidence, instead with mere pronouncement, they are false, you think you have won your case. Actually all you have done is delude yourself.

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
20 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sonhouse
You mean 'no scientific evidence' you personally would accept. The vast majority of real scientists would disagree wholeheartedly with you. There are so many volumes of evidence it makes the head spin but you appear not to be one of those able to accept such evidence, instead with mere pronouncement, they are false, you think you have won your case. Actually all you have done is delude yourself.
I think he means that within the realms of science we're completely happy with evolution. It's only creationists that have issue with it.

BM

RDU NC

Joined
30 Mar 06
Moves
349
Clock
20 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
I think he means that within the realms of science we're completely happy with evolution. It's only creationists that have issue with it.
not all creationists take issue with evolution.

but, biblical inerrantists do.

s
Kichigai!

Osaka

Joined
27 Apr 05
Moves
8592
Clock
20 Jun 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Big Mac
not all creationists take issue with evolution.

but, biblical inerrantists do.
Okay, perhaps I should have said Young Earth Creationists.

[edit; or, as you say, biblical literalists.]

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
20 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Big Mac
not all creationists take issue with evolution.

but, biblical inerrantists do.
Which parts of evolution contradict scripture in your opinion?

w

Joined
02 Jan 06
Moves
12857
Clock
20 Jun 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Okay, perhaps I should have said Young Earth Creationists.

[edit; or, as you say, biblical literalists.]
I am a Biblical literalist who believes in old earth creation.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.