01 Mar '13 11:34>
Originally posted by KellyJayYou know “it exists” strictly because you observed it. If it is not observed, you cannot properly say that “it exists” regardless if it is existent or non-existent to other observers.
I know it exists because...
If it does it does no matter if others do or do not see or are aware.
As I pointed out over and over radio waves are real, I don't see them or hear
them unless I use a radio, not haveing a radio doesn't mean the no longer are
real.
If we all acknowledge something is real but quible about the edges on what is
or isn't the co ...[text shortened]... the truth that it is real, and quite beyond us other than knowing
we are bound to it.
Kelly
The using of a radio is a direct way that eases us to amplify our subjective perception as regards a specific realm of existence, by means of using the proper equipment so that we can observe specific observers that otherwise we could not observe.
Before our observation that validated the existence of the radio waves, at first mathematically by Maxwell in 1867 and then in 1887 by Herz in his lab, the radio waves were not a part of our knowledge and therefore they were not a part of our reality. Solely after a given spacetime in the year 1887 we evaluated them as real, because at that point we observed them directly thanks to Herz. The human beings that were living back in 1866 were not aware of the existence of the radio waves. Their inability was a product of their collective subjectivity, which failed to observe the radio waves. Now, in the year 2013, we are aware of the existence of the radio waves solely Because We Observed Them. Subjectivity to the hilt.
The thesis that “a promise should be kept”, is merely the result of our consensus that “a promise should be kept”. There is no agent that forces us to state that “a promise should be kept” other than our own will. And our will is not objective but subjective
😵