Go back
Is the tree of life a real tree?

Is the tree of life a real tree?

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

@josephw said
Literally true, isn't it? We are the branches and Jesus is the vine? Obviously the language is metaphorical, figurative of a spiritual reality.
If the language is metaphorical and figurative then it isn't literal.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@josephw said
But the Genesis account of creation isn't metaphorical. There are no metaphors, figures of speech, allegorical language or symbolisms in the text. Creation happened literally the way it is described.
And what is your basis for this subjective interpretation and declaration? Your faith?

3 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

@pb1022 said
You do realize, don’t you, that the book of Genesis is about much more than the creation account?
Of course. Genesis is an example of an "antiquities", as the Romans called this type of literature, a popular genre telling of the appearance of humans and the ancestors and heroes, with elaborate genealogies and chronologies fleshed out with stories and anecdotes. There were many such 'books' in ancient times.

Now, I'll tell you why the Jewish one cannot be true history. If everyone on the planet had been wiped out by a global flood, except Noah and his immediate family, then everyone on the planet today would be Semites and this would show up in their DNA. Such is not the case, however. There are people and peoples who are not Semites; this is genetic fact, not theory or speculation. Therefore, we are not all descended from Noah and his immediate family, Therefore, there was no global flood which extinguished all life save for those aboard a boat.

Moreover, if the human race had had to regenerate itself from Noah and his immediate family, we wouldn't be here. Incest leads to infertile off-spring after only five or six generations. (The human race cannot have descended from only two people either, Adam and Eve.)

Vote Up
Vote Down

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tree_of_life_(Kabbalah)


@moonbus said
Of course. Genesis is an example of an "antiquities", as the Romans called this type of literature, a popular genre telling of the appearance of humans and the ancestors and heroes, with elaborate genealogies and chronologies fleshed out with stories and anecdotes. There were many such 'books' in ancient times.

Now, I'll tell you why the Jewish one cannot be true history. ...[text shortened]... r six generations. (The human race cannot have descended from only two people either, Adam and Eve.)
What makes you think Noah was Jewish?

Jews are descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob - not Noah.

And tell me how the theory of evolution just happened to create males and females with effective and functioning reproductive systems intact before they had sex and offspring.

Vote Up
Vote Down


@moonbus said
Of course. Genesis is an example of an "antiquities", as the Romans called this type of literature, a popular genre telling of the appearance of humans and the ancestors and heroes, with elaborate genealogies and chronologies fleshed out with stories and anecdotes. There were many such 'books' in ancient times.

Now, I'll tell you why the Jewish one cannot be true history. ...[text shortened]... r six generations. (The human race cannot have descended from only two people either, Adam and Eve.)
Missed this point:

<<Moreover, if the human race had had to regenerate itself from Noah and his immediate family, we wouldn't be here. Incest leads to infertile off-spring after only five or six generations. (The human race cannot have descended from only two people either, Adam and Eve.)>>

You’re talking about the effects of that today (or in modern times.) You don’t know that that same effect existed in Biblical times.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@pb1022 said
Missed this point:

<<Moreover, if the human race had had to regenerate itself from Noah and his immediate family, we wouldn't be here. Incest leads to infertile off-spring after only five or six generations. (The human race cannot have descended from only two people either, Adam and Eve.)>>

You’re talking about the effects of that today (or in modern times.) You don’t know that that same effect existed in Biblical times.
The laws of physics have not changed in the last 3,000 years.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
Amen.


@moonbus said
The laws of physics have not changed in the last 3,000 years.
Are you equating the laws of physics with human reproduction? Not sure I get your point.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down


-Removed-
You mean the knowledge of good and evil?

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.