Originally posted by bill718Possible is not equal to likely, nor equal to true.
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
Originally posted by bill718There is rational conceivability, an epistemic thing that coheres with logic, and possibility, a metaphysical thing that coheres with instantiation at some rationally possible world. When we examine all of the assertions (from the sources we accept) about the God of each religious tradition, we may find that their instantiation on one rationally coherent entity is metaphysically impossible.* Then the question is, is the idea rationally conceivable to begin with?
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
*We may also find inconsistencies within one tradition.
But the primary concern is, how do we identify the acceptable assertions?
Originally posted by bill718It seems very clear to me that the the Quran and Muhammad were influenced by Satan.
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
Muhammad was inspired by satan himself
Originally posted by bill718Yes it is possible
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
Originally posted by bill718It is also possible that this "god" was actually space aliens trying to help.
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
Originally posted by RJHindsYes, the one called the Holy Spirit had to remain behind on the orbiter and so didn't appear in the flesh. The mission lasted a couple thousand years with only two visitations, first by the one called the Father and second by the one called the Son, neither entirely successful. But the phrase "I'll be back" was reported to have been heard upon lift-off.
In groups of three?
It is possible...
Originally posted by JS357Convincing
Yes, the one called the Holy Spirit had to remain behind on the orbiter and so didn't appear in the flesh. The mission lasted a couple thousand years with only two visitations, first by the one called the Father and second by the one called the Son, neither entirely successful. But the phrase "I'll be back" was reported to have been heard upon lift-off.
It is possible...
Originally posted by bill718Yes.
*It is possible that God spoke to the Jews through the Torah and Moses
*It is possible that God spoke to the Gentiles through the New Testament and Jesus
*It is possible the God spoke to the Arab tribes through the Quran and Muhammad
*It is possible that all of this came from the same God
😏
Yes.
No.
No.
Contradictory information < God.
Originally posted by sonhouseAin't that the truth. lol
ANYTHING people write that suggests support for your god is what you believe. It doesn't matter how cockamamie it all is, you will believe it if it is written down in a forum post or a youtube video.
That is already a proven fact.