You've heard them. You know what they sound like. Most typically black prisoners who visit the prison library a lot and get it in their head that they will be the next nominee for the Supreme Court. They use very big words that don't always make sense in the context of what they are talking about. Let me give an example: "The ramifications of said postizuizations beg to differ wit the evidentuary procedures that are in place to rectify said dispute."
I believe that these forums can be a great place to learn about ideas as well as how to articulate them well. This competition is to find a post in the spiritual forums that will give new meaning to the concept of "clarity challenged." In short, what is the most confusing post you can find in the spiritual forums. The more complicated and hard to understand, the better. It need not be long so it is not necessary to copy and paste Nemesio. 🙂
Originally posted by kirksey957 You've heard them. You know what they sound like. Most typically black prisoners who visit the prison library a lot and get it in their head that they will be the next nominee for the Supreme Court. They use very big words that don't always make sense in the context of what they are talking about. Let me give an example: "The ramifications of said p ...[text shortened]... e long so it is not necessary to copy and paste Nemesio. 🙂
Let the competition begin.
I can make the contest exceedingly short. Just read any of bbarr's posts which contain 25 words or more. Any one of them could win.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH I can make the contest exceedingly short. Just read any of bbarr's posts which contain 25 words or more. Any one of them could win.
Well, you pick it and post it in here fo all to read. My committee will evaluate all entrants.
"By 'pure reason', I'm referring to a prior truths like the results of mathematics or logic (as opposed to a posteriori truths like the results of empirical sciences), truths that are either self-evident or can be logically derived from self-evident truths by any sufficiently intelligent being." LH
Originally posted by kirksey957 "By 'pure reason', I'm referring to a prior truths like the results of mathematics or logic (as opposed to a posteriori truths like the results of empirical sciences), truths that are either self-evident or can be logically derived from self-evident truths by any sufficiently intelligent being." LH
As much as it pains me to say so, this is perfectly clear.
Originally posted by royalchicken As much as it pains me to say so, this is perfectly clear.
Well, OK. Then I stand corrected. If I cannot laugh at my own limitations of so called cognition, then I am as of a superficial nature so as to have ridicule placed upon my so called being.
Originally posted by FreakyKBH I can make the contest exceedingly short. Just read any of bbarr's posts which contain 25 words or more. Any one of them could win.
I find bbarr articulate if a tad over my head. I would have nominated you, dear Freaky, although jaywill is surely the prize at the bottom of this crackerjack box.
Originally posted by kirksey957 You've heard them. You know what they sound like. Most typically black prisoners who visit the prison library a lot and get it in their head that they will be the next nominee for the Supreme Court. They use very big words that don't always make sense in the context of what they are talking about. Let me give an example: "The ramifications of said p ...[text shortened]... e long so it is not necessary to copy and paste Nemesio. 🙂
Let the competition begin.
Don't know if this counts, but this is from RBHILL in the debates forum.
"It is your own sin and own fault.
You can't butter up an excuse.
Like on Way of the master they ask people if they are liers, then the people say yes. Then they ask the people what that makes them and some say human. Then that ask if I lied what would that make me, then the peopel would say a lier. I mena come on know LOL."
I have no idea what he is on about, but it reads like he was typing with his elbows.