1. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    27 Jul '09 02:571 edit
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    Glad to hear it. I was asking because you are knowledgeable. Have you heard about this stuff before?
    yep, the internet is filled with it. there are zillions of sites that mention Jehovahs witnesses, but only one official site. watchtower.org, the witnesses are having a real tough time in Russia at present, not to mention Georgia and Uzbekistan. why don't they appeal to the U.N. if they are part of it, mmmmmm

    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=1331
  2. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    27 Jul '09 03:01
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    yep, the internet is filled with it. there are zillions of sites that mention Jehovahs witnesses, but only one official site. watchtower.org, the witnesses are having a real tough time in Russia at present, why don't they appeal to the U.N. if they are part of it, mmmmmm

    http://www.forum18.org/Archive.php?article_id=1331
    My guess is that only those at the very top know about it. It was secret or is a secret still. That is what I am trying to find out. That is why they wouldn't publicly call on the UN for help. Keep dem sheep you know.
  3. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    27 Jul '09 03:04
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    My guess is that only those at the very top know about it. It was secret or is a secret still. That is what I am trying to find out. That is why they wouldn't publicly call on the UN for help. Keep dem sheep you know.
    Lol, Ok, so they are facing persecution and a complete ban, but despite this they are keeping their membership of the U.N. a secret, LOL, mmmm, rather counter productive don't you think.
  4. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    27 Jul '09 03:061 edit
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    Lol, Ok, so they are facing persecution and a complete ban, but despite this they are keeping their membership of the U.N. a secret, LOL, mmmm, rather counter productive don't you think.
    If the organization was to admit that they have ties with the UN then they risk loosing their flock world wide. Also they realize at this point in time the UN is powerless to do anything about it anyway. How about that Randcam corp.?
  5. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    27 Jul '09 03:412 edits
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    If the organization was to admit that they have ties with the UN then they risk loosing their flock world wide. Also they realize at this point in time the UN is powerless to do anything about it anyway. How about that Randcam corp.?
    would you like to see a facsimile of the letter that was issued, perhaps to put your mind at rest and to make your own evaluation?

    http://www.randytv.com/secret/wt11012001.jpg

    as for the article published in the guardian, it is nothing more than a piece of ill willed sensationalistic journalism and is glaringly deficient because of inaccuracies.
  6. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    27 Jul '09 03:46
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    would you like to see a facsimile of the letter that was issued, perhaps to put your mind at rest and to make your own evaluation?

    http://www.randytv.com/secret/wt11012001.jpg
    It is genuine looking to me but yet it could be a damage control statement too. It is a different version of what I was told about it, that is for sure.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree