1. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    16 Jan '11 06:291 edit
    http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html

    This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.

    I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
  2. Standard memberChessPraxis
    Cowboy From Hell
    American West
    Joined
    19 Apr '10
    Moves
    55013
    16 Jan '11 08:28
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html

    This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.

    I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
    I can't argue with that.
  3. Joined
    27 Sep '06
    Moves
    9651
    16 Jan '11 11:44
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html

    This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.

    I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
    "Darwinian evolution is losing scientific credibility so much so that intelligent design is becoming increasingly respected, and accepted, not just by society, but the scientific community. The lack of intermediate fossil evidence and the evidence of irreducible complexity of living organisms shows that human beings were not cobbled together through the uncreated atoms of atheistic evolution."

    I don't know how accurate all that genealogy is, but I can relate to the statement above.
  4. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    16 Jan '11 15:30
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html

    This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.

    I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
    Congrats RB!! It appears you have single handidly done something that no other theist has been able to do on this thread!!

    Ok, ok, now that we have converted everyone to faith, what should we argue about? I know, did Adam and Eve have a belly button? Well?
  5. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    16 Jan '11 16:571 edit
    Originally posted by whodey
    Congrats RB!! It appears you have single handidly done something that no other theist has been able to do on this thread!!

    Ok, ok, now that we have converted everyone to faith, what should we argue about? I know, did Adam and Eve have a belly button? Well?
    I do agree with josephw on how accurate it is. And I do know that it is by faith. But if that stone is evidence and if you could find tangible evidence off everyone on that lst then how could you argue about that. Who nows I would think they would. But if they didn't have a belly button that would prove they were first to those in their time.
  6. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    16 Jan '11 20:021 edit
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html

    This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.

    I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
    i am directly related to the Scottish Monarchy through my mother, her name being MacGregor, whom we trace our ancestry through to the Scottish King, MacAlpin (9th century), through his third son, indeed, our clan motto is, S Rioghal Mo Dhream, My race is Royal. What the Sassenach and pretender Prince William has to do with this, God only knows! I think his Great granny might have been Scottish, never the less, its well known that the present queen is Hanoverian and a foreigner of German descent. Raise a glass my friends to the restoration of Scotland's own true King - Jesus Christ.
  7. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    16 Jan '11 20:53
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    i am directly related to the Scottish Monarchy through my mother, her name being MacGregor, whom we trace our ancestry through to the Scottish King, MacAlpin (9th century), through his third son, indeed, our clan motto is, S Rioghal Mo Dhream, My race is Royal. What the Sassenach and pretender Prince William has to do with this, God only knows! I th ...[text shortened]... scent. Raise a glass my friends to the restoration of Scotland's own true King - Jesus Christ.
    i like through this blood line is that William is the 157 generation from Adam. some years of raign are missing but i think that the lines between 77 and 82 were hear when Jesus was. Jesus himself from his mothers line is the 77th from that blood line.
  8. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    17 Jan '11 03:38
    I guess you guys can't handle the truth.
  9. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    17 Jan '11 04:211 edit
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    I guess you guys can't handle the truth.
    no its not that, this dude has no claim to the Scottish throne, the real Kings are the Stuarts, not the Hanoverian, they were only deposed because the then Parliament did not want a Catholic Monarch, so they brought in William of Orange, a protestant, and married him off to Mary Stuart, the Sister of James the VII.

    Not only that, he signed the documents resulting in the massacre of Glenco, when a detachment of British soldiers, under the command of Robert Campbell (spit ding!) of Glenlyon, butchered women, and children and men as they slept, many of which perished in the blizzard that was raging outside as they tried to flee!

    Shame on them all!
  10. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    the Devil himself
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    91666
    17 Jan '11 10:46
    Originally posted by RBHILL
    i like through this blood line is that William is the 157 generation from Adam. some years of raign are missing but i think that the lines between 77 and 82 were hear when Jesus was. Jesus himself from his mothers line is the 77th from that blood line.
    No I cant handle that "truth" .
    It basically says that all those ancients, that were around before then, did not exist or were fabricated in some way.
    It would seem a huge fabrication to make up all these people and societies that came before the 157th generation from the supposed first man, Adam.
    Perhaps from a certain point of view it may seem if "Adam"was the first man, though in my version "Adam" was an actual tribe, not just a person.
    And there were people already living for tens of thousands of years before "Adam" came along.
    So again, I do not deny my (and others ) interpretation of the bible, I just want to add to it.
  11. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    17 Jan '11 13:35
    Originally posted by karoly aczel
    [b]No I cant handle that "truth" .
    Killjoy!! 😠
  12. Standard memberRBHILL
    Acts 13:48
    California
    Joined
    21 May '03
    Moves
    223256
    17 Jan '11 17:23
    Originally posted by karoly aczel
    No I cant handle that "truth" .
    It basically says that all those ancients, that were around before then, did not exist or were fabricated in some way.
    It would seem a huge fabrication to make up all these people and societies that came before the 157th generation from the supposed first man, Adam.
    Perhaps from a certain point of view it may seem if ...[text shortened]... n, I do not deny my (and others ) interpretation of the bible, I just want to add to it.
    Why is that?

    Adam and Eve had more then just 3 son the Bible clames they had sons and daughters.

    On a side note you can populate the world fast. The jews went in Egypt with about 70 people and 430 years latter came out with about 2 million people.
  13. Standard membermenace71
    Can't win a game of
    38N Lat X 121W Lon
    Joined
    03 Apr '03
    Moves
    140206
    18 Jan '11 01:58
    Originally posted by robbie carrobie
    no its not that, this dude has no claim to the Scottish throne, the real Kings are the Stuarts, not the Hanoverian, they were only deposed because the then Parliament did not want a Catholic Monarch, so they brought in William of Orange, a protestant, and married him off to Mary Stuart, the Sister of James the VII.

    Not only that, he signed the d ...[text shortened]... ch perished in the blizzard that was raging outside as they tried to flee!

    Shame on them all!
    I remember seeing some documentary on this.




    Manny
  14. Standard membermenace71
    Can't win a game of
    38N Lat X 121W Lon
    Joined
    03 Apr '03
    Moves
    140206
    18 Jan '11 02:00
    There is no way to traces bloodlines all the way back to Adam. Too much lost data.
    It's mere fantasy.



    Manny
  15. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Aug '07
    Moves
    38239
    18 Jan '11 02:11
    Originally posted by menace71
    I remember seeing some documentary on this.




    Manny
    on the Glencoe Massacre? Truly harrowing, you can visit the site, its like a hidden valley. People were so shocked because it showed an absolutely a contempt for natural laws of hospitality, i mean to eat and drink for like seven days with your hosts, play games with them etc then get up in the middle of the knight and start to put them to the sword was horrendous. To throw women and children out into a blizzard on a mountainside and to torch their houses, I mean sufferin succotash. Indeed some of the British soldiers refused to carry out their orders and even today, if you go to Glencoe there is a sign on the door of the local public house, that if you carry the surname Campbell, you shall not receive any service, but the bums rush out the door.
Back to Top