16 Jan 11
Originally posted by RBHILL"Darwinian evolution is losing scientific credibility so much so that intelligent design is becoming increasingly respected, and accepted, not just by society, but the scientific community. The lack of intermediate fossil evidence and the evidence of irreducible complexity of living organisms shows that human beings were not cobbled together through the uncreated atoms of atheistic evolution."
http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html
This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.
I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
I don't know how accurate all that genealogy is, but I can relate to the statement above.
16 Jan 11
Originally posted by RBHILLCongrats RB!! It appears you have single handidly done something that no other theist has been able to do on this thread!!
http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html
This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.
I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
Ok, ok, now that we have converted everyone to faith, what should we argue about? I know, did Adam and Eve have a belly button? Well?
16 Jan 11
1 edit
Originally posted by whodeyI do agree with josephw on how accurate it is. And I do know that it is by faith. But if that stone is evidence and if you could find tangible evidence off everyone on that lst then how could you argue about that. Who nows I would think they would. But if they didn't have a belly button that would prove they were first to those in their time.
Congrats RB!! It appears you have single handidly done something that no other theist has been able to do on this thread!!
Ok, ok, now that we have converted everyone to faith, what should we argue about? I know, did Adam and Eve have a belly button? Well?
16 Jan 11
1 edit
Originally posted by RBHILLi am directly related to the Scottish Monarchy through my mother, her name being MacGregor, whom we trace our ancestry through to the Scottish King, MacAlpin (9th century), through his third son, indeed, our clan motto is, S Rioghal Mo Dhream, My race is Royal. What the Sassenach and pretender Prince William has to do with this, God only knows! I think his Great granny might have been Scottish, never the less, its well known that the present queen is Hanoverian and a foreigner of German descent. Raise a glass my friends to the restoration of Scotland's own true King - Jesus Christ.
http://www.jesusevidence.org/gen.html
This is a prophecy of Genesis 49:10 through the mouth of Jacob.
I mean want more do you need as evidence that the Bible is true.
16 Jan 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobiei like through this blood line is that William is the 157 generation from Adam. some years of raign are missing but i think that the lines between 77 and 82 were hear when Jesus was. Jesus himself from his mothers line is the 77th from that blood line.
i am directly related to the Scottish Monarchy through my mother, her name being MacGregor, whom we trace our ancestry through to the Scottish King, MacAlpin (9th century), through his third son, indeed, our clan motto is, S Rioghal Mo Dhream, My race is Royal. What the Sassenach and pretender Prince William has to do with this, God only knows! I th ...[text shortened]... scent. Raise a glass my friends to the restoration of Scotland's own true King - Jesus Christ.
17 Jan 11
1 edit
Originally posted by RBHILLno its not that, this dude has no claim to the Scottish throne, the real Kings are the Stuarts, not the Hanoverian, they were only deposed because the then Parliament did not want a Catholic Monarch, so they brought in William of Orange, a protestant, and married him off to Mary Stuart, the Sister of James the VII.
I guess you guys can't handle the truth.
Not only that, he signed the documents resulting in the massacre of Glenco, when a detachment of British soldiers, under the command of Robert Campbell (spit ding!) of Glenlyon, butchered women, and children and men as they slept, many of which perished in the blizzard that was raging outside as they tried to flee!
Shame on them all!
17 Jan 11
Originally posted by RBHILLNo I cant handle that "truth" .
i like through this blood line is that William is the 157 generation from Adam. some years of raign are missing but i think that the lines between 77 and 82 were hear when Jesus was. Jesus himself from his mothers line is the 77th from that blood line.
It basically says that all those ancients, that were around before then, did not exist or were fabricated in some way.
It would seem a huge fabrication to make up all these people and societies that came before the 157th generation from the supposed first man, Adam.
Perhaps from a certain point of view it may seem if "Adam"was the first man, though in my version "Adam" was an actual tribe, not just a person.
And there were people already living for tens of thousands of years before "Adam" came along.
So again, I do not deny my (and others ) interpretation of the bible, I just want to add to it.
17 Jan 11
Originally posted by karoly aczelWhy is that?
No I cant handle that "truth" .
It basically says that all those ancients, that were around before then, did not exist or were fabricated in some way.
It would seem a huge fabrication to make up all these people and societies that came before the 157th generation from the supposed first man, Adam.
Perhaps from a certain point of view it may seem if ...[text shortened]... n, I do not deny my (and others ) interpretation of the bible, I just want to add to it.
Adam and Eve had more then just 3 son the Bible clames they had sons and daughters.
On a side note you can populate the world fast. The jews went in Egypt with about 70 people and 430 years latter came out with about 2 million people.
18 Jan 11
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI remember seeing some documentary on this.
no its not that, this dude has no claim to the Scottish throne, the real Kings are the Stuarts, not the Hanoverian, they were only deposed because the then Parliament did not want a Catholic Monarch, so they brought in William of Orange, a protestant, and married him off to Mary Stuart, the Sister of James the VII.
Not only that, he signed the d ...[text shortened]... ch perished in the blizzard that was raging outside as they tried to flee!
Shame on them all!
Manny
18 Jan 11
Originally posted by menace71on the Glencoe Massacre? Truly harrowing, you can visit the site, its like a hidden valley. People were so shocked because it showed an absolutely a contempt for natural laws of hospitality, i mean to eat and drink for like seven days with your hosts, play games with them etc then get up in the middle of the knight and start to put them to the sword was horrendous. To throw women and children out into a blizzard on a mountainside and to torch their houses, I mean sufferin succotash. Indeed some of the British soldiers refused to carry out their orders and even today, if you go to Glencoe there is a sign on the door of the local public house, that if you carry the surname Campbell, you shall not receive any service, but the bums rush out the door.
I remember seeing some documentary on this.
Manny