Go back
JWs and blood transfusions

JWs and blood transfusions

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
What happened?
I've talked about it many, many times over the years here, and in discussions in which you were involved and in posts which you responded to. Presumably this is some kind of deflection.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Another point is why didn't God add with his law on blood the exception of this: "abstain from blood unless you are starving and hungry especially if you are about to die"?
Would not the eating of blood in the case of starvation be a reasonable request from humans to God? So if you believe that, why did he not say there are exceptions to that law?
Eating it could save your life as well as transfusing it into your body, right?

Lol. Where are all the christians? No answers to this?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
I've talked about it many, many times over the years here, and in discussions in which you were involved and in posts which you responded to. Presumably this is some kind of deflection.
No it isn't and sorry for not remembering those comments...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
Drinking alcohol and getting a blood transfusion are totally different things. Which bit of scripture backs up your claim about blood transfusions?
They've been posted already.... All the scriptures that say abstain from blood cover that.

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down


Originally posted by galveston75
All the scriptures that say abstain from blood cover that.
How so? It seems pretty clear that you're just projecting something onto text that is quite clearly about something else. What year did your organisation suddenly introduce this interpretation?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
How so? It seems pretty clear that you're just projecting something onto text that is quite clearly about something else. What year did your organisation suddenly introduce this interpretation?
Well seems we are at a stalemate on what the word abstain means. Until you understand what the explination means in every dictionary in the world, we have no reason to keep discussing this...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
Well seems we are at a stalemate on what the word abstain means. Until you understand what the explination means in every dictionary in the world, we have no reason to keep discussing this...
Look, I get the stuff about blood in pagan rites, sacrifices and other practices the Hebrews didn't like. But the rest of it is just you superimposing something different onto it.

What year was it ~ when your organisation suddenly decided to project this interpretation onto the Bible text and, in so doing, set itself apart from rival organisations?

Do you know the year?

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

this has degenerated into a discussion about whether blood transfusions save lives or not. whether they are sometimes the only alternative to death or not. (it is not up for debate, at the moment it is the best and sometimes only option in many medical cases)


that wasn't my intention.


i just wanted to point out how the government CAN intervene in many countries to remove a child in danger of losing its life from murdering parents. how the authorities CAN intervene and prevent a murder.


i can't summon the strength to explain to a fundamentalist jw how his belief is moronic. i simply want to make sure that innocent children who don't have a voice (legally) aren't killed because of what some sheeple believe.


http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2013spring/article5.html

Read and become educated on blood.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by galveston75
http://stanmed.stanford.edu/2013spring/article5.html

Read and become educated on blood.
What year was it ~ when your organisation suddenly decided to project this interpretation onto the Bible text and, in so doing, set itself apart from rival organisations?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by FMF
What year was it ~ when your organisation suddenly decided to project this interpretation onto the Bible text and, in so doing, set itself apart from rival organisations?
As I said we have come to a stalemate so let's leave it at that. And I'm not looking for a loaded question that no matter how I answer you will be just like Dive dude and never listen to the answer and possibly learn something for your own health should you need a transfusion. You and he are only here to blindly condemn the JW's and could care less about the dangers and what God has said.
I'm done with this thread unless any Christians have the "you know what" to comment on my last question about their child eating blood. I'm still waiting on that......

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit

Originally posted by galveston75
As I said we have come to a stalemate so let's leave it at that. And I'm not looking for a loaded question that no matter how I answer you will be just like Dive dude and never listen to the answer and possibly learn something for your own health should you need a transfusion. You and he are only here to blindly condemn the JW's and could care less about ...[text shortened]... " to comment on my last question about their child eating blood. I'm still waiting on that......
FMF is an apostate, he has left Christianity and formed his own religion, meism and attracts other scourgy windbags like wussjeester. You are correct they are uninterested in establishing the Biblical perspective and are simply content to proffer their own opinions as substantiation for their religion of mesim. Christianity was never like that, it was all about other people.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.