. . . or blessings from people you consider to be delusional:
Do they trouble you?
Is there proper etiquette for dealing with such gestures or blessings?
Do they have a positive influence on you, even if your mirror neurons and cosmoconception tell you that the other person is crazytoons?
Does kindly intent have its own influence that cannot be described by mathematics or physics?
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidI wouldn't describe 'believers' as delusional. 'Incorrect', certainly.
. . . or blessings from people you consider to be delusional:
Do they trouble you?
Is there proper etiquette for dealing with such gestures or blessings?
Do they have a positive influence on you, even if your mirror neurons and cosmoconception tell you that the other person is crazytoons?
Does kindly intent have its own influence that cannot be described by mathematics or physics?
Kindly gestures (as you describe them) are harmless and don't trouble me in the least. They come from a good place.
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidPlease, give us an example of what you mean.
. . . or blessings from people you consider to be delusional:
Do they trouble you?
Is there proper etiquette for dealing with such gestures or blessings?
Do they have a positive influence on you, even if your mirror neurons and cosmoconception tell you that the other person is crazytoons?
Does kindly intent have its own influence that cannot be described by mathematics or physics?
Illuminate us.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think "differently believing" might be better than "incorrect".
I wouldn't describe 'believers' as delusional. 'Incorrect', certainly.
01 Aug 21
@suzianne saidTBH, it's strange that you should respond in this way, defensively and challengingly.
Please, give us an example of what you mean.
Illuminate us.
I'm not trying to troll you, and not trying to lay any expectations on you, but I imagine that sometime in your life before you croak you might learn how to be kind rather than snippy because of your personal experiences.
@kevin-eleven saidNo, I'll still with incorrect.
I think "differently believing" might be better than "incorrect".
There are no gods.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidWhere did I ever mention gods?
No, I'll still with incorrect.
There are no gods.
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidWhy are you surprised by such a reply in a thread entitled 'Kindly gestures from lunatics? '
TBH, it's strange that you should respond in this way, defensively and challengingly.
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidHave you perhaps posted this thread in the wrong forum?
Where did I ever mention gods?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt was surprising to find out that Suzianne might have thought I was calling her a lunatic.
Why are you surprised by such a reply in a thread entitled 'Kindly gestures from lunatics? '
01 Aug 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidDon't pull this Sealioning crap on me. Please provide links where I mentioned "gods" without paraphrasing or summarizing or putting your own spin on it, and let people judge for themselves based on what I actually wrote.
Have you perhaps posted this thread in the wrong forum?
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidYou post this thread in the SF and your OP speaks of blessings and delusions and lump believers in gods (people who give blessings) alongside lunatics.
Don't pull this Sealioning crap on me. Please provide links where I mentioned "gods" without paraphrasing or summarizing or putting your own spin on it, and let people judge for themselves based on what I actually wrote.
Did you not?
01 Aug 21
@kevin-eleven saidRevisit the title of your thread and your OP.
It was surprising to find out that Suzianne might have thought I was calling her a lunatic.
I am baffled by your surprise.
01 Aug 21
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI suspect you are also easily baffled by waffles.
I am baffled by your surprise.