09 Jun '23 09:00>
@catpower25 saidI thought you wanted me to “leave you alone” .. and yet here you are discussion me in another forum.
Touched a nerve.
Interesting.
@catpower25 saidI thought you wanted me to “leave you alone” .. and yet here you are discussion me in another forum.
Touched a nerve.
@divegeester saidIf those two episodes were exactly the same except the relationships were hetero, then you wouldn't have a problem. Right?
Lol, ok.
No I would have preferred it if two episodes hadn’t been wasted on exploring gay relationships in survival situations.
@vivify saidI think its fair to say that almost all straight men [about 98% of the men] do not fancy seeing homoxexual men portrayed in movies. It really is a turnoff. If someone does not find that a turnoff then it is also fair to say they are bisexual or gay.
If those two episodes were exactly the same except the relationships were hetero, then you wouldn't have a problem. Right?
@rajk999 saidThat episode wasn't meant to be erotic, it was meant to tell a story of two people growing old together. So even in that case you still can't watch it if the characters are gay men?
I think its fair to say that almost all straight men [about 98% of the men] do not fancy seeing homoxexual men portrayed in movies. It really is a turnoff. If someone does not find that a turnoff then it is also fair to say they are bisexual or gay.
@fmf saidGiven the bigoted responses in this thread, I'd say that's a pretty accurate representation.
The only appearance of characters [and a storyline] that were explicitly Christian portrayed them as monsters. A rather predictable cheap shot by 'Hollywood', I think.
@vivify saidThere aren’t any “bigoted responses” in this thread 🤔
Given the bigoted responses in this thread, I'd say that's a pretty accurate representation.
@vivify saidIt depends on what exactly they are discussing. People are attracted to or entertained by things to which they can identify. Gay men's conversation would not in any way be interesting. Some of it might even be distasteful. In any event, I would get up and walk away from such a movie and find something better to do.
That episode wasn't meant to be erotic, it was meant to tell a story of two people growing old together. So even in that case you still can't watch it if the characters are gay men?
@rajk999 saidWhat if they were lesbians?
It depends on what exactly they are discussing. People are attracted to or entertained by things to which they can identify. Gay men's conversation would not in any way be interesting. Some of it might even be distasteful. In any event, I would get up and walk away from such a movie and find something better to do.
@vivify saidGays discussing their past lives 5/100
What if they were lesbians?
@rajk999 saidYou watch movies to be turned on?
I think its fair to say that almost all straight men [about 98% of the men] do not fancy seeing homoxexual men portrayed in movies. It really is a turnoff. If someone does not find that a turnoff then it is also fair to say they are bisexual or gay.
@vivify saidI don’t “have a problem” and the episodes would still be uninteresting.
If those two episodes were exactly the same except the relationships were hetero, then you wouldn't have a problem. Right?
@vivify saidAre they hot lesbians, or crewcut wearing Greenham Common types?
What if they were lesbians?
@suzianne saidNice gaslighting.
You watch movies to be turned on?
Turn off the porno.