Originally posted by gtbiking4life
I'm not ignoring the posts - some things I just don't have enough time for and I have a tendency to forget. So please stop with your own accusing attitude and false assumptions. I may not answer right away, so instead of taking the simpleton approach and assume I ignored you, just give me some time. I may not answer right away and may have forgotten, s not perfect, including the prophet. Only Jesus Christ himself was perfect - no one else.
When Jesus Christ came to Earth, He overwrote many laws that were in the OT. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality as one of the changes. I believe that since Jesus never mentioned it, it did not change.
Earlier in this thread, when TW asked about Christians using "Leviticus to justify homophobia", you responded as follows:
I believe the OT laws were just that...Old laws. Christians get their name from Jesus Christ who was in the NT. Jesus Christ himself over wrote the Old laws (Law of Moses/Mosaic Law) when he gave the Sermon on the mount in the NT.
Now it seems that you've reversed yourself. What's up with that?
Also, I have to wonder how far you'd be willing to take the concept of Jesus having to specifically mention a given law for Him to have changed it. Would it also apply in the case of wearing garments made from more than one fiber or trimming the hair on the sides of ones head (both Leviticus) for example?
Regarding the teachings of Paul...Jesus spoke mainly on loving everyone, regardless of who they are. Jesus' actions certainly reflected this and the LDS Church does likewise. I believe Paul's teachings reflect the teachings of Jesus.
I asked you to support your belief via the teachings of Jesus. It makes little sense to respond with the teachings of Paul even if you believe them to be reflective of the teachings of Jesus. Paul taught what he taught and Jesus taught what He taught. You're avoiding the issue. If you had asked me to back something up with the teachings of Jesus and I responded with the teachings of someone else, say Ghandi, because I believed his teachings were reflective of the teachings of Jesus, would you find that acceptable? Remember, you keep claiming to follow the teachings of Jesus, not Paul.
Do you believe that the following teaching reflects the teachings of Jesus? It seems to be antithetical to what you've been saying.
1 Corinthians 5
9I wrote you in my letter not to associate with immoral people; 10I did not at all mean with the immoral people of this world, or with the covetous and swindlers, or with idolaters, for then you would have to go out of the world. 11But actually, I wrote to you not to associate with any so-called brother if he is an immoral person, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or a swindler—not even to eat with such a one.
Jesus spoke mainly on loving everyone, regardless of who they are. Jesus' actions certainly reflected this and the LDS Church does likewise...Keep in mind though, even though I believe in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints and believe it is true, I also believe that it's members are not perfect, including the prophet. Only Jesus Christ himself was perfect - no one else.
From what I can tell, the LDS is willing to excommunicate practicing homosexuals. This also seems antithetical to what you've been saying about the teachings of Jesus.
So once again, does it bother you that the LDS does not do likewise? Have you spoken out against the LDS position?
I'm not ignoring the posts - some things I just don't have enough time for and I have a tendency to forget. So please stop with your own accusing attitude and false assumptions. I may not answer right away, so instead of taking the simpleton approach and assume I ignored you, just give me some time. I may not answer right away and may have forgotten, so chill with the ignoring crap. I'm not as young as I used to be.
Once again, there's no sense getting defensive about it. It is what it is.