23 Mar '12 16:53>
Originally posted by RJHindsWords like "Arab", "Islamic", "Islam", "Jihad", "Kaaba", and "Mecca" have been inserted into quotes from Revelation.
What is the text you think appears to be added by me to the Revelation?
Originally posted by RJHindsHere is a verse - just one example - from Revelation as copy pasted by you above:
Those were not all quotes from the Holy Bible. Some of that was from
Ellis Skolfield. As far as the words you quoted, maybe you will find them
in the Koran or other writings from Mohammed, the false prophet of Islam.
Originally posted by galveston75I do not see the connection with you including the USA in the beast prophecy.
What the two headed beast is in Revelation:
John says this “And I saw another wild beast ascending out of the earth, and it had two horns like a lamb, but it began speaking as a dragon. And it exercises all the authority of the first wild beast ( League of Nations ) in its sight. And it makes the earth and those who dwell in it worship the first wil ...[text shortened]... ned wild beast as a guardian of liberty and a font of material good things.
Sound familiar?
Originally posted by RJHindsnobody has a good track record of understanding prophecy because it's all nonsense.
I do not see the connection with you including the USA in the beast prophecy.
I think you are on the wrong tract. Did you get this idea from the Watchtower
Society? They don't have a very good track record on understanding prophecy.
Originally posted by RJHindsI didn't think you would, so what's new? Anyway you admit you don't know much about Revelation so who are you to say this is not correct?
I do not see the connection with you including the USA in the beast prophecy.
I think you are on the wrong tract. Did you get this idea from the Watchtower
Society? They don't have a very good track record on understanding prophecy.
Originally posted by galveston75You must be referring to the words in parentheses. Those words are not in
What the two headed beast is in Revelation:
John says this “And I saw another wild beast ascending out of the earth, and it had two horns like a lamb, but it began speaking as a dragon. And it exercises all the authority of the first wild beast ( League of Nations ) in its sight. And it makes the earth and those who dwell in it worship the first wil ...[text shortened]... ned wild beast as a guardian of liberty and a font of material good things.
Sound familiar?
Originally posted by RJHindsDid you yourself not comfirm that beast in the Bible means governments or world powers? Is this 1 headed 2 horned beast not the finale beast in this order of beast or governments that have ruled? Is this one headed 2 horned beast not a dual world power? Is this beast not over persuasive in it's dealings in the world and always tring to spread it's influance and it's dominance over the world? Does this beast not threaten the world to conform or else? Is this beast not the one who invented the A bomb hence "fire from heaven" plus it's other destructive weapons?
You don't have to listen to me. It just does not make sense to me, that's all.
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat it "actually means"? Pretty rich coming from someone who admits he doesn't know much about Revelation. So if someone added references to the Jews into verses from Revelation, then that person could then argue - legitimately - that the Jews follow a "false religion that rides and controls the beast" and that verses from Revelation show this to be so? Or they could insert references to the Catholics or the Southern Baptists or Buddhists or JWs, or whoever they wanted, and then claim that the verses from Revelation "actually mean" that the Catholics or the Southern Baptists or Buddhists etc. are "satanic" etc. etc.
You must be referring to the words in parentheses. Those words are not in
the Biblical text. They are words used by Ellis Skolfield to describe what the
previous word or idea in the vision actually means.
Originally posted by RJHindsOh so you claim we follow a man but it's ok for you to qoute a mans thoughts that may not know much more then you do? Lol
You must be referring to the words in parentheses. Those words are not in
the Biblical text. They are words used by Ellis Skolfield to describe what the
previous word or idea in the vision actually means. This is a quicker way of
presenting his interpretation of the text than repeating the text again. It
would have been more clear if he had explained ...[text shortened]... ed
Daniel's vision of the Beasts to him. But this is the way Ellis Skolfield chose
to do it.
Originally posted by VoidSpiritOf course not. It's up to ones asking for God for guidence and then using discernment and connecting the dots. But if one does not believe in the Bible or the prophicies in it, then it would not make much sense to that one.
nope, sorry. i looked but couldn't fine the united states and britian mentioned in the bible.
Originally posted by galveston75So readers of Revelation - like you and RJHinds, for instance - can speculate as they see fit and use its verses to condemn or dehumanize any group they want?
Of course not. It's up to ones asking for God for guidence and then using discernment and connecting the dots. But if one does not believe in the Bible or the prophicies in it, then it would not make much sense to that one.
But can you honestly say that this could not be speaking of these two world leading governments plus the League of Nations and the later United Nations in the descriptions here in Revelation?
Originally posted by FMF""I'm nothing like RJH in the least.""
So readers of Revelation - like you and RJHinds, for instance - can speculate as they see fit and use its verses to condemn or dehumanize any group they want?