Originally posted by Rajk999The Catholic encyclopedia attempts to give "proofs" from scripture, tradition and reason.
So give me the background to the doctrine. All you said was that Mary was not of original sin.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm
Whatever doubts you have about the doctrine, it is unlikely that the authors would accept your characterisation of the doctrine as 'made-up'.
Originally posted by Conrau KThats definitely an example of a man-made doctrine.
The Catholic encyclopedia attempts to give "proofs" from scripture, tradition and reason.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/07674d.htm
Whatever doubts you have about the doctrine, it is unlikely that the authors would accept your characterisation of the doctrine as 'made-up'.
There is no Biblical support for even wanting to contrive such a doctrine. They even go so far as to say that Mary's parents were cleansed by the Holy Spirit and became sinless as well before they had Mary.
Well, if nothing Catholicism is interesting.
Originally posted by Rajk999Perhaps you ought to re-read the article. The authors do not say that Mary's parents were cleansed by the Holy Spirit; they only briefly allude to St. John Damascene who argued this.
Thats definitely an example of a man-made doctrine.
There is no Biblical support for even wanting to contrive such a doctrine. They even go so far as to say that Mary's parents were cleansed by the Holy Spirit and became sinless as well before they had Mary.
Well, if nothing Catholicism is interesting.
The point is that, historically, this doctrine has existed throughout the years of the early church; it has had currency among early Christians and the main controversy for the past eighteen-hundred years, since Origen, has been whether Mary was spared from original sin at conception or afterwards. The doctrine developed over centuries; it was not 'made-up'.
Originally posted by Rajk999But many Christians believe that they receive information directly from the Holy Spirit.
Thats definitely an example of a man-made doctrine.
There is no Biblical support for even wanting to contrive such a doctrine.
I find it interesting how many theists make two contradictory claims:
1. The only information we have from God is in the Bible.
2. They have received information directly from God.
What is also interesting his how many people making claim 1. have no idea where the Bible came from.