@sonship saidhttps://www.space.com/12796-photos-apollo-moon-landing-sites-lro.html
@divegeesterIn 1969 and subsequently, did man land on and walk on the moon. Yes or no?
I told you that I don't know. What's a matter for you ?
I told you that I have some doubts now about what I saw.
You know, in another decade or two we'll probably be able to zoom in on the astronauts' footprints in the dust. I suppose then you'll just say the images might be fake.
@Soothfast
Here's two videos I'd like you to consider from opposite sides.
Pro and Con. Its hard for me to decide.
PRO (Authentic) - Analyzing the Apollo 15 Feather and Hammer Drop - A Basic, Introductory Free-Fall Problem
CON (Non-authentic) - MOON HOAX NOW a documentary film by Jet Wintzer (55 minutes)
4 edits
you see evidence of faked photos and apply the same all or nothing rational and end up in the dilemma you are in now.
No I don't apply an all or nothing dilemma.
I have said something is fishy.
I have said before maybe this happened yet we do not know all the details and propaganda was used.
All or nothing would be that nothing ever occurred in the Apollo mission. I know that that is not true. But the studio footage doesn't help the case of some who insist there should be no skepticism at all.
And maybe six or so times men did land on the moon. I could be wrong.
So I think I'll keep the Revelation talk on your "terrible mean god you guys have" thread matter over there and the "Moon Landing" matter over here.
If you are concerned about "All or Nothing" maybe you can not attempt to make that discussion spill over to here and visa versa. Everything does not have to relate back to your favorite topic.
1 edit
A) Did Apollo go to the moon? The albeit old, but overwhelming evidence, says yes.
B) Do corporations like NASA fake photos for marketing purposes? Of course they do because they sell the program.
C) Does the existence of B mean that A didn’t happen? No of course not.
I agree basically with your C that doctored video footage, though doesn't help, may not mean no Moon walking was done at all.
If you have a post from me stating otherwise, let me see it. Now maybe one or more of the videos I referenced did go so far.
2 edits
2) shadows on flashing across on distant viewing. This could be anything moving in front of the camera.
What camera?
How could an object flashing across the used camera there cast those shadows across the lunar horizon and across the astronaut's back pack? Wouldn't we see that object in the camera's lens?
Are you suggesting that there was off the screen another camera with a bright light source attached to it in front of which objects flashed ?
I appreciated your comments. But a slam-dunk it was not.
2 edits
@WOLFE63
WOLFE63 hasty lumping everyone in one category is quick and comfortable. It doesn't really help to get at specific views held.
The climate matter I expected BEFORE "climate change" or "global warming" were household expressions.
Jesus Christ told us that there would be cataclysmic weather preceding His second coming.
"And there will be signs in the sun and moon and stars, and upon earth anguish of nations in perplexity at the roaring of the sea and the billows,
Men fainting from fear and expectation of what is coming upon the inhabited earth; for the powers of the heavens will be shaken." (Luke 21:25-27)
I always expected that at close of the age "the roaring of the sea and the billows" indicated world wide climate catastrophes. These things will precede the coming of Christ and the millennial kingdom.
1 edit
The camera being used, anything could have moved across the aperture and created the effect of a shadow.
How do you "move across" the setting of the aperture of a camera with an object?
This is like saying anything moving across the shudder speed.
And I don't see how moving an object across the size of the opening where light comes into the lens creates a shadow across the ground and on the backpack of the astronaut being photographed.