@ghost-of-a-duke saidNot at all. You actually think your histrionics are having any effect on me?
I suspect you now think differently.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidOh come now. You're being a silly sop.
Again, with the stigma surrounding mental health the title is ill-judged, and unnecessary. Sure, you're using it for hypothetical reasons, but that doesn't render it any less repugnant. And yes, you are very much perpetuating the myth around mental health.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidNo it doesn't. Read the thread.
It adds to the stigma around mental health, the false narrative. Of course it does. Perhaps you have forgotten the title?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidThe title is fine i put it in quotation marks. And then there's a hypothetical question. Read the thread. Stop being so puffed up and daft.
Perhaps you have forgotten the title?
@ghost-of-a-duke saidI think the thread title is a good one. I think the way it was used to pose a hypothetical question. I think the OP is good. The title is good. The thread is good.
Lacking Dive's 'sopiness' I suspect you realise your OP should have better clarified the inflammatory quote in the title. It's the reason you were dodging parts of my post.
-Removed-Over there? Do you mean there are no terrorist attacks there?
"Since 1970, there have been at least 3,395 terrorist-related deaths in the UK, the highest in western Europe."
wiki
"In most years terror attacks caused fewer than 50 deaths per year, and in many years no one died from attacks. With exception of 2001, terrorism accounted for less than 0.01% of all deaths in the US in every year since 1970." In America.
ourworldindata.org
You know nothing. But keep blurting.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidYes. It's in quotation marks. It's a good title for this thread. Go and seek out your silly sops if you are worried about them.
Or perhaps you should read the title:
"Most violence is caused by mental illness"
@ghost-of-a-duke saidIt wasn't necessary. If you think that it was me expressing my opinion, then so be it.
Why isn't that quotation accredited?