Mr Hinds Penguins

Originally posted by Proper Knob
How did this 'flaw' come about?

How should I know? I doubt that even a biologist
could explain it with present knowledge.

Originally posted by RJHinds
How should I know? I doubt that even a biologist
could explain it with present knowledge.

Well you seem to have all the answers so far. How do you think this 'flaw' originated? It seems to be a DNA coding mistake to me.

Originally posted by Proper Knob
Well you seem to have all the answers so far. How do you think this 'flaw' originated? It seems to be a DNA coding mistake to me.

No, I don't have all the answers. I'll leave that one for you
to search out.

Originally posted by RJHinds
You need to be checked for Attention deficit disorder.

Ha Ha. Is that your latest favorite phrase for people who show you up?

Originally posted by RJHinds
You are using the definition for adaptation to replace
the definition for evolution since you know evolution
is a false teaching.

No, I am using the definition for evolution as it is defined. If you don't like it, you can try to show that my definition is non-standard (in which case I would be expected to qualify it when I use it in the non-standard way).
The real problem is that you have got it in your head that evolution is a false teaching (probably because someone from your Church told you so) and so you cant accept any definition for 'evolution' for which that claim is not true.

But to back up my definition:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution
Evolution (also known as biological or organic evolution) is the change over time in one or more inherited traits found in populations of organisms.

Don't like it? See if you can get away with editing Wikipedia.

Originally posted by RJHinds
No, I don't have all the answers. I'll leave that one for you
to search out.

The answer is obvious, but you ain't gonna like it.

Evolution.................evolution..............evolution..............

Originally posted by twhitehead
Ha Ha. Is that your latest favorite phrase for people who show you up?

I thought it was kind of funny, too. Ha! Ha!

Originally posted by twhitehead
No, I am using the definition for evolution as it is defined. If you don't like it, you can try to show that my definition is non-standard (in which case I would be expected to qualify it when I use it in the non-standard way).
The real problem is that you have got it in your head that evolution is a false teaching (probably because someone from your Chu populations of organisms.

Don't like it? See if you can get away with editing Wikipedia.

I gave a list of definitons once to Proper Knob.
At that time none of you evolutionists would agree
that they were correct. Now here you are throwing
one back at me that is very similar to what I had
quoted from another site. So what happened to this
idea of the one common ancestor from which all
life evolved? So apes never evolved into man?
If that is so, maybe we can resolve our disagreement
and forget defining "kind". You are beginning to make
me happy. You may be a good man after all.