07 Mar '06 08:39>
Evolutionary scientists argue that natural selection provides the answer to why accidental chance mutations would result in the progressive evolution of life. The theory of natural selection requires progressive development at every successive step. However, random evolution and mutations cannot themselves process intelligent understanding and planning. Unthinking evolutionary process could never produce a half -formed eye as a transition in order to ultimately form a fully functioning eye. How could the complete eye have been produced by evolution through natural selection by step-by-step random mutations in gradual stages? Obviously, until the eye was fully functional it was of no value whatsoever.
It seems that evolutionists, whether consciously or unconsciously, have regarded the blind and inanimate forces of the environment, or nature as having the ability to create and think.
In other words, despite their denial of intelligent design, the theory of evolution actually requires an intelligent, purposeful mind directing the process at every one of the supposed millions of imaginary intermediate stages as if these incremental changes were following a plan to produce a new lifeform.
It seems that evolutionists, whether consciously or unconsciously, have regarded the blind and inanimate forces of the environment, or nature as having the ability to create and think.
In other words, despite their denial of intelligent design, the theory of evolution actually requires an intelligent, purposeful mind directing the process at every one of the supposed millions of imaginary intermediate stages as if these incremental changes were following a plan to produce a new lifeform.