New evidence for common ancestor, blood types:

http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html

More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2012-10-primates-common-blood-ancestor.html

More evidence mankind had common ancestors 20 million years ago, all primates, in fact. We all have ABO type blood and now it was shown that set of blood types came about much earlier than previously thought. DNA analysis showed this.

what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?

is this where the god of gaps steps in?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?

...decide...?

You don't seem to have quite got a handle on the evolutionary process there.

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
...decide...?

You don't seem to have quite got a handle on the evolutionary process there.

oops my bad, happen to randomly occur through some process or another, possibly
genetic, possibly environment, possibly both, but as yet, we dont really know.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
oops my bad, happen to randomly occur through some process or another, possibly
genetic, possibly environment, possibly both, but as yet, we dont really know.

No it didn't randomly occur and the process is evolution.

Which you don't understand.

Originally posted by googlefudge
No it didn't randomly occur and the process is evolution.

Which you don't understand.

blah de blah de blah, the process is a hypothesis which cannot be falsified, is therefore
not science and deserves to be drop kicked to the realms of weird nerd fiction. Tell us
again why reptiles who apparently morphed into birds in the Darwinian scheme of
things, left off being cold bloodied and ended up being warm bloodied?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
blah de blah de blah, the process is a hypothesis which cannot be falsified, is therefore
not science and deserves to be drop kicked to the realms of weird nerd fiction. Tell us
again why reptiles who apparently morphed into birds in the Darwinian scheme of
things, left off being cold bloodied and ended up being warm bloodied?

I have tried explaining evolution to lying ignoramuses like yourself (including yourself)
before and it never gets anywhere due to the fact that you wilfully refuse to engage
in any sort of reasoned discussion.

You also demonstrate a depressing inability to be able to make any sort of argument that
is not dripping with logical fallacies.

You are also an insulting (rudeword).

Which makes it hard to drum up the enthusiasm to explain the basics of evolution to you
again.


I do it every so often for those who might read it who have an open mind, but I really
can't be bothered to do it right now.


But saying that evolution can't be falsified is a downright lie.

And a bit rich coming from someone who's alternative is "god did it" which really can't
be falsified.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
what about reptiles and birds, when did they decide to change from being cold blooded
to warm bloodied? DNA analysis, is that the same DNA evidence that not one of you
materialists could explain how you came about it?

Why this deflection to birds and reptiles? They are on a totally different branch of the life tree and I think you know that, therefore you engage in deflection to obfuscate the issue. This issue is the commonality of very early primate types, the ancestor of all the primates, and all the diverse branching, one of which leads to homo sapians.

Originally posted by sonhouse
Why this deflection to birds and reptiles? They are on a totally different branch of the life tree and I think you know that, therefore you engage in deflection to obfuscate the issue. This issue is the commonality of very early primate types, the ancestor of all the primates, and all the diverse branching, one of which leads to homo sapians.

a simple, 'I dont know and googlefudge doesn't either', will suffice, thank you.

Originally posted by googlefudge
I have tried explaining evolution to lying ignoramuses like yourself (including yourself)
before and it never gets anywhere due to the fact that you wilfully refuse to engage
in any sort of reasoned discussion.

You also demonstrate a depressing inability to be able to make any sort of argument that
is not dripping with logical fallacies.

You ...[text shortened]... h coming from someone who's alternative is "god did it" which really can't
be falsified.

a Charlie Brown muffled trumpet sound of the teacher , 'wah wah wah'.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
a simple, 'I dont know and googlefudge doesn't either', will suffice, thank you.

In other words, 150 years of work on evolution has resulted in absolutely nothing? The nothing part, of course, being where it collides with religious dogma and fairy tales from the biblical version of creation.

So it doesn't matter that the scientific method used to discover planets in the solar system or around other stars is the same as that used in evolution, or geology and many other sciences, you are ok with ALL those other sciences that use the same fundamental science program, THOSE are all ok, but somehow it all breaks down with evolution. Why don't you think about that for a moment.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
a simple, 'I dont know and googlefudge doesn't either', will suffice, thank you.

Well it would be blatantly untrue and unlike you we are not inveterate and compulsive liars so you will not be getting that.

Originally posted by sonhouse
In other words, 150 years of work on evolution has resulted in absolutely nothing? The nothing part, of course, being where it collides with religious dogma and fairy tales from the biblical version of creation.

So it doesn't matter that the scientific method used to discover planets in the solar system or around other stars is the same as that used in ...[text shortened]... k, but somehow it all breaks down with evolution. Why don't you think about that for a moment.

Yes that is correct, Nada!

Originally posted by googlefudge
Well it would be blatantly untrue and unlike you we are not inveterate and compulsive liars so you will not be getting that.

wah wah wah.