Originally posted by robbie carrobie
you complied a heap of straw, no one was saying that there is magic involved, no one was claiming there were two minds. The claim was that the materialist in this case had made a an unfounded comment based on some kind of biological basis, that by attempting to evaluate the cognitive process by reducing it to a purely material level he committed the ...[text shortened]... processes than you can ask why the universe came into existence by staring through a telescope.
... The claim was that the materialist in this case had made a an unfounded comment based on some kind of biological basis, ...
"The Materialist"... Who is this person?
Oh... You mean all people who believe that the world is purely made up of matter and energy following the laws of physics,
with no magic/supernatural/spiritual/dualist/ect elements or factors involved... [or something along those lines]
Well, assuming that this guy does believe such things, that doesn't mean that every argument he, or anyone else
who is a 'materialist', is correct or well founded.
You basically seem to be saying "A 'Materialist' made an argument/proposed a hypothesis that I believe is wrong and thus
all 'Materialists' and materialism is wrong."...
Which as is being multiply pointed out is complete bunk.
Materialism being true does not automatically validate any argument [allegedly] based in materialistic principles.
So the 'fact' that you have here what looks like a bad argument that is in part of a materialist nature doesn't in any way
demonstrate that materialism is itself at fault.
The human experience can no more be described by biological processes than you can ask why the universe came into existence by staring through a telescope.
Actually you can learn a great deal about the universe and how it formed by "staring through a telescope"...
although most of the 'staring' is done by CCD's of various sorts.
It's only part of the picture, you get other bits by doing particle physics for example, but it's a major facet of
building a picture of the universe and learning of it's origins.
It helps tell us [for example] how old the visible universe is, how big it is, what it's made of... All kinds of useful and
important information.
As LJ says, you cannot [currently, or possibly ever] explain or describe the beauty of a sunset in terms of
electrical and chemical interactions in the brain, or the structure and interaction of neurons caused by photons
entering the eye. But those neurons, made of chemicals, are what is creating that conciousness that is having the
experience.