Originally posted by Grampy Bobby stellspalfie, quote caught my attention as relevant to some contributors to this forum.... hoped you would respond not react.
the quotes did not speak to me, they seemed shallow and simplistic. soundbites from a bygone era.
edit. i would like you to know that your suggestion that i was 'grandstanding' is inaccurate and that my questions were not genuine is wrong...its not my style ii post for me and ask questions for me.
Originally posted by stellspalfie the quotes did not speak to me, they seemed shallow and simplistic. soundbites from a bygone era.
edit. i would like you to know that your suggestion that i was 'grandstanding' is inaccurate and that my questions were not genuine is wrong...its not my style ii post for me and ask questions for me.
Okay... your edit I read with considerable interest:
"edit. i would like you to know that your suggestion that i was 'grandstanding' is inaccurate and that my questions were not genuine is wrong...its not my style ii post for me and ask questions for me."
May I ask what is your "style" in our other conversation? Thread 158620
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby Okay... your edit I read with considerable interest:
"edit. i would like you to know that your suggestion that i was 'grandstanding' is inaccurate and that my questions were not genuine is wrong...its not my style ii post for me and ask questions for me."
May I ask what is your "style" in our other conversation? Thread 158620
i do not have a 'style'. i write what i think and ask questions i want to know the answers to. you are way off the mark.
Originally posted by stellspalfie i do not have a 'style'. i write what i think and ask questions i want to know the answers to. you are way off the mark.
That makes sense.... in your opinion, what is the "mark"?