Originally posted by rwingett
Having mythical stories in the literature of a certain religion for instructive purposes is not necessarily a bad thing. The problem comes when its practitioners believe them to be literally true. There are many particulars of Christianity that are not universally (or even widely) held as being literally true, and which therefore do not merit the level of s ...[text shortened]... on. Huxley's 'Brave New World' is the surest outcome for any system run by technocrats.
Mention “Technocracy” today and a mix of responses emerge. “It’s in a lot science fiction books,” explained one younger friend. “It’s a model for a utopian world run by technology.”
An older gentleman, a product of the 1940s, laughed when I mentioned the word; “It was a crack-pot idea with a cult following. Thankfully it died long ago.”
Another friend who was a child during the Great Depression remembers hearing about it at the kitchen table, and seeing Technocracy literature in the house.
Technocracy was all of the above: a utopian dream, a cult-like movement, and a concept that captured the public’s attention. But it was and is much more; it’s the prime motivator. Today, the fingerprints of Technocracy are deeply impressed upon the political, economic, military, social and spiritual landscape. There isn’t anything that Technocracy hasn’t touched, chiefly because as a type of meta-philosophy, it rests on the most basic principle of human rebellion: By pursuing god-like illumination, Man can become as God.
Man, not God, is the ultimate engineer of human destiny – therefore, Man is God. Technocracy represents the pinnacle of Man’s quest for self-deification: The perfectibility of Man through the thoughts of his mind and the subsequent works of his hands. It’s the cosmic taunt, stemming from the most ancient of days. What God can do, Man can do. The Garden of Eden will be remade.
http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/forcing-change/010/7-technocracy-1.htm
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Spain