11 May '12 13:57>
A Maximally Great Being cannot exist.
To exist requires a differentiation.
To be a Functional Unit amongst
and transcending
other functional units,
means it can never be maximal.
It must be All and Absolute.
To be a Functional Unit alone,
means no differentiation.
Does it then "exist"?
A Maximally Great Being cannot not-exist.
To not-exist requires also a differentiation.
Maximally Great is a comparative.
How can that which is comparative
be maximally great?
A Maximally Great Being neither exists
nor does it not-exist.
Nor does it exist and not-exist at the same time,
If unto "itself" alone, it remains undifferentiated.
If a Being amongst other beings, it is comparative
and not maximally great.
What manifestation can ever name its Source?
Is "God" finally nameable?
Many sacred ways question that possibilty.
Does that which is unnameable and without form "exist" or equally, shown not to exist?
To exist requires a differentiation.
To be a Functional Unit amongst
and transcending
other functional units,
means it can never be maximal.
It must be All and Absolute.
To be a Functional Unit alone,
means no differentiation.
Does it then "exist"?
A Maximally Great Being cannot not-exist.
To not-exist requires also a differentiation.
Maximally Great is a comparative.
How can that which is comparative
be maximally great?
A Maximally Great Being neither exists
nor does it not-exist.
Nor does it exist and not-exist at the same time,
If unto "itself" alone, it remains undifferentiated.
If a Being amongst other beings, it is comparative
and not maximally great.
What manifestation can ever name its Source?
Is "God" finally nameable?
Many sacred ways question that possibilty.
Does that which is unnameable and without form "exist" or equally, shown not to exist?