Once you are dead you are dead

@kellyjay said
You can ignore it but you can not say no evidence.

The tenets of your faith do not constitute evidence. People claiming that there is life after death is not, in and of itself, evidence.

-Removed-

No do you?

-Removed-

It is evidence no qualifications other than that, there isn’t Christian evidence, unbelievers evidence, Muslin evidence any more than there are flavors of truths, some for one others for another. You put those things in different boxes you lose truth for opinions.

The Bible is a collection of writings not by a single man in a specific time and place but a collection that spans time and places with a variety of authors from kings, prophets, fishermen, doctors, and others. What makes you think it is the Word of God, or do you really?

@fmf said
The tenets of your faith do not constitute evidence. People claiming that there is life after death is not, in and of itself, evidence.

History

@kellyjay said
History

People BACK IN HISTORY claiming that there is life after death is not, in and of itself, evidence.

@fmf said
People BACK IN HISTORY claiming that there is life after death is not, in and of itself, evidence.

A dramatic change in the world as it was due to one rising from the dead is a very
a large piece of historical evidence.

@kellyjay said
A dramatic change in the world as it was due to one rising from the dead is a very
a large piece of historical evidence.

It is not "a large piece of historical evidence" that there is life after death nor, indeed, that anyone rose from the dead.

@kellyjay said
A dramatic change in the world as it was due to one rising from the dead is a very
a large piece of historical evidence.

The "dramatic change in the world" that you refer to is evidence of what certain people believed and how they acted upon those beliefs. It is not evidence of people actually being immortal.

Tens of millions of people in the U.S. believe - passionately, adamantly, earnestly, imperviously - that their preferred candidate won the presidential election by a landslide in 2020. This is not "historical evidence" that the candidate won by a landslide.

@fmf said
It is not "a large piece of historical evidence" that there is life after death nor, indeed, that anyone rose from the dead.

Your opinion is noted.

@kellyjay said
Your opinion is noted.

Your sidestepping of it is also noted.