@pbsandwich saidYou debated it before with @avalanchethecat when you were posting here as PB1022 earlier this year and he ran rings around you.
Thanks, but I’ve read quite a bit on the theory of evolution and have debated it more than a few times.
@fmf saidIf that’s true, which it’s not, you should be able to recall and explain the lack of transitional forms in the fossil record, which Darwin himself should be truly enormous in number, and the Cambrian explosion. And those are just two of the many problems/flaws with the theory.
You debated it before with @avalanchethecat when you were posting here as PB1022 earlier this year and he ran rings around you.
But the theory endures because it’s the religion of atheists.
@pbsandwich saidMost Christians I have discussed evolution with over the last 40+ years believe that evolution is the way that their God figure arranged for life to develop on Earth. If they are right, then evolutionary scientists - including "atheists", perhaps inadvertently - are simply describing the nature of the Abrahamic God's creation.
the theory of evolution’s not credible in my view and exists mainly as a religion for atheists.
@pbsandwich saidMy bad for using shorthand. @KellyJay. Other frequent posters here are also sometimes abbreviated, not only by me.
Who is KJ?
"Dive" and "Geester" and "The Gooster" are all commonly used expressions for @divegeester. @FMF is short enough not to need abbreviation. I am sometimes referred to simply as "moon" or "Mr. Bus." @suzianne is nearly always referred to as "Suzi", and she accepts "Misfit Queen" or "Jalapeno Kitten", but if you refer to her as anything else, be prepared for adverse feedback.
FYI.