18 Sep '06 19:06>1 edit
Quoting the following from the NYTimes:
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,” said Alberto Melloni, professor of history at the University of Modena who has written several books on the Vatican. “It’s never happened as far as I know.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/18/world/europe/18pope.html
(Article available for only a week or so)
While I certainly applaud the Pope for his apology for his comments --
comments I feel were merely poorly considered, not insidious -- does
it strike anyone, Roman Catholics in particular, that apologies are at
the very best rare, and at worst non-existent?
I mean, a figure like the Pope is going to be under a great deal of
public scrutiny, which means his speeches and actions are going to be
under a microscope. Given that he is a man and prone to error, just
like all of the rest of the human race, don't you think that apologies
would be more common? And, unlike political positions like, say, the
idiotic American president, apologies for wrongs committed are part
and parcel of Christian faith. I would think that they ought to be
rather common, no?
Nemesio
Edit: That is, I don't expect the Pope to be apologetic on controversial
issues upon which he has taken a dogmatic stance like abortion or
contraception. However, I would think it would be a demonstration of
Christ-likeness for a religious figurehead to apologize on behalf of
his own actions as well as on behalf of the Church.
What possible explanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'
Although Benedict’s predecessor, John Paul II, issued several apologies for the historical failings of the church, experts said it appeared to be the first time in recent memory that a pope had made such a direct statement of personal regret. “This is really, really abnormal,” said Alberto Melloni, professor of history at the University of Modena who has written several books on the Vatican. “It’s never happened as far as I know.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/18/world/europe/18pope.html
(Article available for only a week or so)
While I certainly applaud the Pope for his apology for his comments --
comments I feel were merely poorly considered, not insidious -- does
it strike anyone, Roman Catholics in particular, that apologies are at
the very best rare, and at worst non-existent?
I mean, a figure like the Pope is going to be under a great deal of
public scrutiny, which means his speeches and actions are going to be
under a microscope. Given that he is a man and prone to error, just
like all of the rest of the human race, don't you think that apologies
would be more common? And, unlike political positions like, say, the
idiotic American president, apologies for wrongs committed are part
and parcel of Christian faith. I would think that they ought to be
rather common, no?
Nemesio
Edit: That is, I don't expect the Pope to be apologetic on controversial
issues upon which he has taken a dogmatic stance like abortion or
contraception. However, I would think it would be a demonstration of
Christ-likeness for a religious figurehead to apologize on behalf of
his own actions as well as on behalf of the Church.
What possible explanation can there be for the absence of person
apology in 'recent history' or 'ever?'