19 Sep '06 00:07>
Originally posted by Conrau KIs that how the pope reconciles his view then? By disregarding the OT?
The text says that He does, but a cursory knowledge of Hebrew literature would cause me to avoid those texts.
Originally posted by dottewellWhy shouldn't it stick in his mind? The book wasn't about the evil of Islam. It was a dialogue about faith.
Still, no reason for this to stick in his mind - still less for him to feel the need to recount it.
You wouldn't expect him to have said: "I was reminded of this when I was using a public toilet in Burnley, and saw some graffiti saying 'Muslims out'."
Originally posted by dottewellI suspect he's playing with the quote a bit. He could have replaced Mohammed with Jesus and the conclusion still would have made sense. Perhaps he is making his speech relevant to those who still promote their religion using extremism.
I meant that particular quote.
Originally posted by Conrau KOnce again, I read the speech (Ivanhoe gave the link in Debates). Once again, using a quote which says, in effect, that everything new that Muhummad brought to the table was "evil" and "inhumane" is offensive to Muslims. Once again, the Pope's non-apology is doubly offensive; although he is under no obligation to apologize for his remarks such an insincere, pretend "apology" for PR reasons is worthless and absurd.
He was recounting a personal anecdote. He says,
"I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on - perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara - by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam ...[text shortened]... disagreement with some parts). He was just referring to it in order to illustrate his point.
Originally posted by Conrau KDon't you feel that referring to Manuel II Paleogous as erudite and
He was recounting a personal anecdote. He says,
"I was reminded of all this recently, when I read the edition by Professor Theodore Khoury (Münster) of part of the dialogue carried on - perhaps in 1391 in the winter barracks near Ankara - by the erudite Byzantine emperor Manuel II Paleologus and an educated Persian on the subject of Christianity and Islam ...[text shortened]... disagreement with some parts). He was just referring to it in order to illustrate his point.
Originally posted by no1marauderIt wsn't intended as an offense. The Pope is one of the leading Catholics in Islamic research. One noticeable thing in his speech is his investigation into Islamic scholarship. The views represented by the quote are not his.
Once again, I read the speech (Ivanhoe gave the link in Debates). Once again, using a quote which says, in effect, that everything new that Muhummad brought to the table was "evil" and "inhumane" is offensive to Muslims. Once again, the Pope's non-apology is doubly offensive; although he is under no obligation to apologize for his remarks such an insincere, pretend "apology" for PR reasons is worthless and absurd.
Originally posted by Conrau KOr he could have found a less offensive quote.
I suspect he's playing with the quote a bit. He could have replaced Mohammed with Jesus and the conclusion still would have made sense. Perhaps he is making his speech relevant to those who still promote their religion using extremism.
Originally posted by DoctorScribblesWhat I meant by text was the commandment to massacre non believers. I did not mean the OT.
You said that you would avoid the text. Does avoiding the text altogether constitute hermeneutics?
Originally posted by NemesioIt's very difficult to give an apology. The Pope represents one-billion Catholics from varying cultures, opinions and wealth. There needs to be a certain level of diplomacy.
Don't you feel that referring to Manuel II Paleogous as erudite and
then quoting the passage that says only evil has come out of Islam
sends a mixed message?
This thread has gotten off topic. My question was, why is it so
surprising that a Pope would have apologized?
Don't you think that, as Christ's vicar on earth, he should be among
the fastes ...[text shortened]... people to issue apologies, even when he has inadvertantly
said something hurtful?
Nemesio