Pope on teh ggayzors

Originally posted by Suzianne
The funniest thing is that you discern yourself as the epitome of reason.

hes a gaylord flunkie, like most militant atheists he believes his own propaganda

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
hes a gaylord flunkie, like most militant atheists he believes his own propaganda

Were you just calling me gay as an insult?

Because that way lies bannable offences and unlike FMF I WILL report you.


Also "hes" contains an apostrophe and is capitalised at the beginning of a sentence.

If you are going to insult me and make yourself look even stupider than you already do.
You should at least make sure you get your spelling and grammar correct.

Also, those people in cults who's main occupation is turning up uninvited at peoples front doors
so that they can ram their religious propaganda down these peoples throats...
They should probably think twice about talking about ANYONE else believing in their own
propaganda.

Those that live in glass houses shouldn't throw bricks at those that live in castles.

@Robbie
You never answered this

So anal sex is unnatural.
by the same argument so is oral sex,
and hand jobs are out,
axillary sex? (much employed by the staid Victorians)
frottage?

Everything taboo.

French kissing?
(Surely our tongues are not designed to go into someone elses mouth!?!?)

What do you and the missus do?

Originally posted by Suzianne
O rly?

unicorns?

Bump for robbie.

You want to point out these "unicorns"?

Originally posted by Suzianne
Bump for robbie.

You want to point out these "unicorns"?

i knew you loved unicorns,

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+39%3A9-12&version=KJV

dig.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Indeed, but this is a consequence of a faith that is essentially passive.

Faith is passive?

I would bugger the Pope on national TV if we could have peace on Earth.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
i knew you loved unicorns,

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Job+39%3A9-12&version=KJV

dig.

Wow something strange in the KJ that the JW's removed; as opposed to making up strange stuff and putting it in their own

Originally posted by whodey
Faith is passive?

No, it's not.

But robbie's point is that for many Christians, it is very passive, to their detriment.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
lol thats rich coming from a whacked out translation like yours that mentions unicorns.

At the time of the King's James translation the one horned rhinoceros was called a unicorn as indicated by old dictionaries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_rhinoceros