07 Jun 12
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsWell your man Pendleton has a Bs in chemistry but he is wearing a white coat telling people he is a Phd. But what is a dude who worked as a car technician have to do with evolution? What has chemistry got to do with geology for instance?
Proof Dinosaurs Lived With Man
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmC4dwCcsUs
But he wouldn't be a creationist would he? Nah, not your man, he is totally unbiased.
Oh, wait, here is a page about him and what he has been doing:
http://www.angelfire.com/mt/GICC/jppersonalministryinfo.html
BTW, look at the comments underneath that so-called scientific expo.
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseSo since he might have made a spelling error, he is not a true scholar and should be ignored. Okay, I understand.
Well your man Pendleton has a Bs in chemistry but he is wearing a white coat telling people he is a Phd.
But he wouldn't be a creationist would he? Nah, not your man, he is totally unbiased.
Oh, wait, here is a page about him and what he has been doing:
http://www.angelfire.com/mt/GICC/jppersonalministryinfo.html
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseHere is better proof
Well your man Pendleton has a Bs in chemistry but he is wearing a white coat telling people he is a Phd. But what is a dude who worked as a car technician have to do with evolution? What has chemistry got to do with geology for instance?
But he wouldn't be a creationist would he? Nah, not your man, he is totally unbiased.
Oh, wait, here is a page abou ...[text shortened]... rsonalministryinfo.html
BTW, look at the comments underneath that so-called scientific expo.
07 Jun 12
2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsWell show me the papers he wrote in real science, you obviously think of him as a scientist, so show me his real work, not that fakery presented as if it were a real science lecture. For instance, he takes the work of real scientists who found the soft tissue, he doesn't even mention Mary Schweitzer, a REAL scientist who made this discovery, just using it in his perverted attempt to discredit real science.
So since he might have made a spelling error, he is not a true scholar and should be ignored. Okay, I understand.
Why didn't he even give a footnote to the actual person who made this discovery?
BTW, in your so-called Better Proof, I really love the first comment:
"The only reason I would have to deny evolution is because it includes creationists."
This is what Mary has to say about this hijacking of her discovery:
Meanwhile, Schweitzer’s research has been hijacked by “young earth” creationists, who insist that dinosaur soft tissue couldn’t possibly survive millions of years. They claim her discoveries support their belief, based on their interpretation of Genesis, that the earth is only a few thousand years old. Of course, it’s not unusual for a paleontologist to differ with creationists. But when creationists misrepresent Schweitzer’s data, she takes it personally: she describes herself as “a complete and total Christian.” On a shelf in her office is a plaque bearing an Old Testament verse: “For I know the plans I have for you,” declares the Lord, “plans to prosper you and not to harm you, plans to give you hope and a future.”
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html#ixzz1x8xaHgEF
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseOkay. Look at this one from a PHD.
Well show me the papers he wrote in real science, you obviously think of him as a scientist, so show me his real work, not that fakery presented as if it were a real science lecture. For instance, he takes the work of real scientists who found the soft tissue, he doesn't even mention Mary Schweitzer, a REAL scientist who made this discovery, just using it i ...[text shortened]... ure.”
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html#ixzz1x8xaHgEF
Extraordinary Evidence that Dinosaurs Lived with Man
By Don Patton PHD
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseI can understand that she does not want anyone else hijacking and possible discrediting her discoveries with the established scientific community that is made up mostly of scientists, who have been taught evolution is the explanation for everything and that dionosaurs must have been 65 million years old.
Well show me the papers he wrote in real science, you obviously think of him as a scientist, so show me his real work, not that fakery presented as if it were a real science lecture. For instance, he takes the work of real scientists who found the soft tissue, he doesn't even mention Mary Schweitzer, a REAL scientist who made this discovery, just using it i ...[text shortened]... ure.”
Read more: http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaur.html#ixzz1x8xaHgEF
However, the 65 million years is an assumption based on other assumptions and is not testable or proof. She does not say the dinosaur in proven to be 65 million years old. That is just her assumption based on what other people have told her.
07 Jun 12
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsOk, meaning you admit Pendleton is a fraud, not interested in advancing real science, only in the destruction of science?
Okay. Look at this one from a PHD.
Extraordinary Evidence that Dinosaurs Lived with Man
By Don Patton PHD
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QmC4dwCcsUs
Here is a bit on your so-called Phd:
Don Patton
(b. 1941)
Don Patton is a young-earth creationist who, along with Carl Baugh, is known as a proponent of the claim that human footprints appear alongside dinosaur tracks in the Paluxy Riverbed of Glen Rose, Texas.
Patton has claimed Ph.D. candidacy in geology from Queensland Christian University in Australia. According to Glen Kuban:
When I asked Patton for clarification on this during the [1989 Bible-Science] conference, he stated that he had no degrees, but was about to receive a Ph.D. degree in geology, pending accreditation of QCU, which he assured me was "three days away." Many days have since passed, and Patton still has no valid degree in geology. Nor is the accreditation of QCU imminent. [4]
Glen Kuban has written more extensively on Patton's claimed degrees in his articles on the Paluxy "man-tracks".
07 Jun 12
Originally posted by sonhouseDon Patton, Ph.D.in Education granted 12/10/1993 (Pacific School of Graduate Studies)
Ok, meaning you admit Pendleton is a fraud, not interested in advancing real science, only in the destruction of science?
Here is a bit on your so-called Phd:
Don Patton
(b. 1941)
Don Patton is a young-earth creationist who, along with Carl Baugh, is known as a proponent of the claim that human footprints appear alongside dinosaur tracks in the Pa ...[text shortened]... en more extensively on Patton's claimed degrees in his articles on the Paluxy "man-tracks".
http://www.bible.ca/tracks/ask-creationist.htm
Note at the end of the referenced link there is a list of his education.
So you are apparently reading more evolutionists propaganda.