There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. Each species is locked into its chromosome count that cannot change. If an animal developed an extra chromosome or lost a chromosome because of some deformity, it could not successfully mate. The defect could not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.
Originally posted by RJHinds Chromosome Count Proves Evolution is Wrong
There is no scientific evidence that a species can change the number of chromosomes within the DNA. The chromosome count within each species is fixed. This is the reason a male from one species cannot mate successfully with a female of another species. Man could not evolve from a monkey. Each species is locked i ...[text shortened]... not be passed along to the next generation. Evolving a new species is scientifically impossible.
If I prove that you are wrong, will you admit it? Or will you simply ignore it and start a new thread with another or your lies?
Originally posted by twhitehead If I prove that you are wrong, will you admit it? Or will you simply ignore it and start a new thread with another or your lies?
Single Cell Complexity Proves Evolution is Wrong
Scientists a century ago believed the smallest single living cell was a simple life form. The theory developed that perhaps lightning struck a pond of water causing several molecules to combine in a random way which by chance resulted in a living cell. The cell then divided and evolved into higher life forms. This view is now proven to be immature to the degree of being ridiculous. The most modern laboratory is unable to create a living cell. In fact, scientists have been unable to create a single left-hand protein molecule as found in all animals.
Originally posted by twhitehead If I prove that you are wrong, will you admit it? Or will you simply ignore it and start a new thread with another or your lies?
you have two guesses on whether he will admit it or not.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi you have two guesses on whether he will admit it or not.
DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
Originally posted by RJHinds DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi you have two guesses on whether he will admit it or not.
LOL.
I think we all got the message that we are totally wasting our time trying to have any constructive debate with the moron who has been proven wrong so many times but just continuous unabated anyway.
Originally posted by Zahlanzi The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
you are talking out of your ahole again.
rror correction is a property of some, but not all, DNA polymerases. This process corrects mistakes in newly synthesized DNA. When an incorrect base pair is recognized, DNA polymerase reverses its direction by one base pair of DNA. The 3'-5' exonuclease activity of the enzyme allows the incorrect base pair to be excised (this activity is known as proofreading). Following base excision, the polymerase can re-insert the correct base and replication can continue.
Originally posted by RJHinds DNA Error Checking Proves Evolution is Wrong
The scientific fact that DNA replication includes a built-in error checking method and a DNA repair process proves the evolutionary theory is wrong. The fact is that any attempt by the DNA to change is stopped and reversed.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord!
Error checking does indeed ensure that DNA is reproduced with remarkable fidelity but not without diversity on a wide range of characteristics - taller, shorter, longer, thicker and so forth.
The ability to breed selectively has been known to farmers for at least ten thousand years and applied to plants, domesticated animals and farm animals. So it is hardly contentious that this happens. So we cannot seriously dispute that diversity exists in every species and can result in selective breeding.
All we require for Natural Selection is that changes in the environment favour some more than other members of a species on the basis of a significant individual difference within the range of well established diversity that is not even contentious.
Originally posted by finnegan Error checking does indeed ensure that DNA is reproduced with remarkable fidelity but not without diversity on a wide range of characteristics - taller, shorter, longer, thicker and so forth.
The ability to breed selectively has been known to farmers for at least ten thousand years and applied to plants, domesticated animals and farm animals. So it is ...[text shortened]... dividual difference within the range of well established diversity that is not even contentious.
God allows for adaptation. I have never said otherwise. God does not allow for one kind to change into another kind. Science has never shown this to be the case, but evolutionists claim it can, if given enough time. They accept this even though it goes against their own criticism that the creation model is not testable. They do not have millions of years to test their hypothesis, yet it is readily accepted as fact.
Originally posted by RJHinds God allows for adaptation. I have never said otherwise. God does not allow for one kind to change into another kind. Science has never shown this to be the case, but evolutionists claim it can, if given enough time. They accept this even though it goes against their own criticism that the creation model is not testable. They do not have millions of years to test their hypothesis, yet it is readily accepted as fact.
To quote Einstein then, "so much the worse for God then"
When he said that it was referring to an experimental study that came out in support of Relativity. He said if it had not been so then ... There is no evidence that God breaks the laws of science or even mathematics.
Your assertion is just stupid nonsense. Science has indeed shown this to be the case in lots of ways.
Originally posted by RJHinds God allows for adaptation. I have never said otherwise. God does not allow for one kind to change into another kind. Science has never shown this to be the case, but evolutionists claim it can, if given enough time. They accept this even though it goes against their own criticism that the creation model is not testable. They do not have millions of years to test their hypothesis, yet it is readily accepted as fact.
So I can assume the answer to Twit's question would be no since you have ignored it.
Originally posted by finnegan To quote Einstein then, "so much the worse for God then"
When he said that it was referring to an experimental study that came out in support of Relativity. He said if it had not been so then ... There is no evidence that God breaks the laws of science or even mathematics.
Your assertion is just stupid nonsense. Science has indeed shown this to be the case in lots of ways.
You idiot. What are you talking about. This is utter nonsense to the 10th degree. Where is your proof?????
Originally posted by sonhouse So I can assume the answer to Twit's question would be no since you have ignored it.
I might as well ignore it. He can't prove anything of a sort, because he would have to start with the same old wrong assumptions and he hasn't got enough time and it is all untestable. It is nothing but evolutionary lies and pure crap.
Proof evolution is wrong
06 Jun '12 11:25
YouTube
Back to Top