Proof of evolution???

The belief that a lost rib, or a cut-off thumb, or a chopped-off tail, could pass from parent to child was a theory, long-discredited, derived from the ideas of French biologist Lamarck.

Generations of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian males have circumcised their sons, but they never give birth to already circumcised sons.

For centuries some breeds of dogs have had their tails cropped, but they don't give birth to pups with their tails docked already.

If you have a finger or toe amputated, it would not mean you would produce children with a finger or toe missing. Likewise, if a human baby is born with a tail, it does not imply they evolved from monkeys.

So a rib taken from Adam does not mean that any of his sons and daughters would have a rib missing. Men and women have the same number of ribs.

http://www.creationtips.com/ribs.html

The baby born with a tail is no evidence of evolution or that he was a reincarnated Hindu god.

As biologist Dr. Gary Parker once said about these fatty tumor tails: “So far as I know, no one claims we evolved from an animal with a fatty tumor at the end of its spine.”

http://www.creationtips.com/babytail.html

Originally posted by RJHinds
The belief that a lost rib, or a cut-off thumb, or a chopped-off tail, could pass from parent to child was a theory, long-discredited, derived from the ideas of French biologist Lamarck.

Generations of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian males have circumcised their sons, but they never give birth to already circumcised sons.

For centuries some breeds of d ...[text shortened]... nimal with a fatty tumor at the end of its spine.”

http://www.creationtips.com/babytail.html

Originally posted by SwissGambit
The Christians wouldn't link talkorigins and deleted the link when someone tried to post it. Pansies.

But that's nothing a little googling can't fix.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/section2.html#atavisms_ex2

Originally posted by RJHinds
Just more deceptions from Satan, the father of lies.

Give me evidence of someone that can wag his tail.

P.S. I bet this is going to be funny.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I gave you the link. If you want to actually see the evidence, take it from there. Do your own research.

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."

Originally posted by RJHinds
The belief that a lost rib, or a cut-off thumb, or a chopped-off tail, could pass from parent to child was a theory, long-discredited, derived from the ideas of French biologist Lamarck.

Generations of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian males have circumcised their sons, but they never give birth to already circumcised sons.

For centuries some breeds of d nimal with a fatty tumor at the end of its spine.”

http://www.creationtips.com/babytail.html

Originally posted by RJHinds
The belief that a lost rib, or a cut-off thumb, or a chopped-off tail, could pass from parent to child was a theory, long-discredited, derived from the ideas of French biologist Lamarck.

Generations of Jewish, Muslim, and Christian males have circumcised their sons, but they never give birth to already circumcised sons.

For centuries some breeds of d ...[text shortened]... nimal with a fatty tumor at the end of its spine.”

http://www.creationtips.com/babytail.html

Originally posted by RJHinds
Just as I thought. Pure crap.

Originally posted by SwissGambit
I gave you the link. If you want to actually see the evidence, take it from there. Do your own research.

"You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink."

Originally posted by humy
What on earth are you talking about?
Evolution theory doesn't claim nor predict that a non-genetic characteristic of an individual such as an amputated tail would be passed on to its offspring or evolve into its descendants so what you say here is irrelevant.

Originally posted by sonhouse
In his case, 'You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him THINK'.

Originally posted by RJHinds
It doesn't work the other way around either. That is pure crap, too.

Originally posted by humy
What is this “the other way around” that you are referencing here? And the “other way around” to what?
-oh, I forget; you like talking crap.

Originally posted by RJHinds
That is being born with an extra appendage, like an arm, finger, toe, leg or even a head is no proof for evolution. It's all crap.

Originally posted by sonhouse
How does being born with two heads, like you, have anything to do with evolution. That has everything to do with mutations.