Go back
Question and answer game

Question and answer game

Spirituality

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
I guess the same reason that blacks are always jobless and are better at sports and like to eat watermelon. 😛
that is racist; and they dont like watermelon they like fried chicken.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
18. True or False? The geologic column presents clear evidence of a sequence of different ages.
false

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
18. True or False? The geologic column presents clear evidence of a sequence of different ages.
EcstremeVenom is right the answer is False.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
EcstremeVenom is right the answer is False.
So where'd all those distinct layers come from then?

Even though Louis Pasteur (1860's) scientifically proved that life could not spontaneously generate from non-living matter, today"s evolutionists are willing to believe it did.

The idea of basic cells emerging in primordial seas has nothing to do with the idea of mice popping into existence in piles of trash...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
Answer:
A. a hypothesis of spontaneous generation.
[Dr. G. Wald, "The Origin of Life," Scientific American, August 1954] Even though Louis Pasteur (1860's) scientifically proved that life could not spontaneously generate from non-living matter, today"s evolutionists are willing to believe it did.
Pasteur proved no such thing. What he showed was that it was highly unlikely that modern living organisms arose from non-living organic material. This is a much more restricted claim than that primitive life once arose from non-living non-organic material. Not only that, but his experiment had a massively limiting physical environment.

Vote Up
Vote Down

19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
An idiot. Firstly science has nothing to do with competition for ideas, that's politics or religion. Secondly, ID has no basis in scientific method.

Why did you not answer my question earlier?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
EcstremeVenom is right the answer is False.
Neither of you is right!!! Nor is your stupid board game.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by EcstremeVenom
that is racist; and they dont like watermelon they like fried chicken.
Neither of which have the requisite number of ridges to fit into our hands.

They should all be eating bananas.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
Answer: A. Cal Thomas (columnist)

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
19. Who said it? Science is supposed to be about openness to competing ideas. But the very people who want to impose evolution as the only scientific explanation for life on the planet violate this basic tenet of science when it comes to intelligent design."
A. Cal Thomas.
B. Peter Jennings.
C. Chuck Smith.
A total idiot. ID has NO BASIS in science.

ID is nothing more than belief in magic.

Vote Up
Vote Down

20. What does the "no-hair theorem" have to do with?
A. Deforestation.
B. Black holes.
C. Male pattern baldness.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
20. What does the "no-hair theorem" have to do with?
A. Deforestation.
B. Black holes.
C. Male pattern baldness.
If it's anything like the no-brain theory, then I'd guess it's to do with creationists.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by scottishinnz
Neither of which have the requisite number of ridges to fit into our hands.

They should all be eating bananas.
no, not that atheist nightmare thing. who eats bannanas? monkeys, not humans. they were made for monkeys

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by RBHILL
20. What does the "no-hair theorem" have to do with?
A. Deforestation.
B. Black holes.
C. Male pattern baldness.
Answer: B. Black Holes.
In astrophysics, the no-hair theorm states that black holes have no features that distinguish one black hole from another, other than mass, charge, and angular momentum.