Originally posted by twhitehead
So I have clearly misunderstood the concept of irreducible complexity. I was under the mistaken impression that it meant that an entity could not operate without any one of its parts. Would you care to enlighten me as to where my mistake is?
ok, not only must i provide an example of irreducible complexity, which i did, and as yet, no one has provided anything remotely resembling evidence as to why the human cell, remember that, the human cell, could function, as a complete entity, without the team work that exists between DNA, RNA and the proteins they produce.
Andrew Hamilton, to his credit, and i had to admire his honesty, produced what he termed a , 'plausible hypothesis', based on other types of biological systems, you also were prepared to do the same, most admirable as well, but let me state this, hopefully for the last time, human life cannot exist without the teamwork between DNA, RNA and proteins, thus the human cell is irreducibly complex, because if we take away anyone of these components, it simply could not function.