Romansfetchbecker and the trinity

-Removed-

I’m not a returning user, amigo. Whether I’m annoying I guess is in the eye of the beholder.

You shouldn’t be angry I called you out on your all-night posting binge, You were really going off the rails and needed to board the express train to Dreamland before you cracked up.

-Removed-

You didn’t repeatedly give me the Wikipedia definition, amigo; you told me to look it up.

How can I respond to a question when you won’t define the terms?

-Removed-

<<it there’s nothing new in that is there.>>

Do you want to take another stab at writing that sentence? My gibberish to English translator is on the fritz.

-Removed-

So you've moved on from him being me or sonship? Who is he now? GP Bobby?

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
A reasonable person makes a post and then enters a dialogue about the points made in that post. An unreasonable person makes 14 posts in a row, safe in the knowledge that no one can respond to the contents of those 14 posts. (Due to the sheer mass).

That's what spamming does Sherlock. It drowns dialogue.

I agree with you Watson, but you said "A reasonable person makes a post and then enters a dialogue about the points made in that post."

Like that ever happens between antagonists in this forum. 😕

Originally posted by @secondson
I agree with you Watson, but you said "A reasonable person makes a post and then enters a dialogue about the points made in that post."

Like that ever happens between antagonists in this forum. 😕

You were wise to agree with me sir.

An elementary decision.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
You were wise to agree with me sir.

An elementary decision.

I'm an elementary kind of guy.

Temperance is key to a meaningful exchange of ideas. I fall short. Too often I allow self to get in my own way.

Originally posted by @secondson
I'm an elementary kind of guy.

Temperance is key to a meaningful exchange of ideas. I fall short. Too often I allow self to get in my own way.

Yep, we atheists suffer the same affliction.

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
Yep, we atheists suffer the same affliction.

It seems no matter what we label ourselves we're all only human after all. We're made of the same stuff.

Then I say, "there's something more".

And you say, "there's no evidence".

And on and on it goes till we're ripping into each other like a pack of dogs over a bone. Not my idea of dialogue. No accusation intended.

Originally posted by @secondson
It seems no matter what we label ourselves we're all only human after all. We're made of the same stuff.

Then I say, "there's something more".

And you say, "there's no evidence".

And on and on it goes till we're ripping into each other like a pack of dogs over a bone. Not my idea of dialogue. No accusation intended.

For my part, it's not so much 'dogs fighting over a bone,' but gentleman squabbling over the last cucumber sandwich.

Originally posted by @secondson
I agree with you Watson, but you said "A reasonable person makes a post and then enters a dialogue about the points made in that post."

Like that ever happens between antagonists in this forum. 😕

How can one have a dialogue/debate on whether Jesus identified Himself as God unless the evidence is first presented? And I haven’t even finished presenting verses and passages.