Originally posted by @dj2beckerHere is a discussion about my "John W Booth" practical joke 7 years ago Thread 174151.
So does that mean FMF is also a proven liar with his multiple accounts?
Originally posted by @fmfAh yes when you do it it's a practical joke but when I do it I am a proven liar.
Here is a discussion about my "John W Booth" practical joke 7 years ago Thread 174151.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf your's was a practical joke, just say so. But you didn't say so at the time. Was it a practical joke? I just remember you repeating questions that you had already asked me and that I had already answered - but you did it with a different screen name and pretended you were someone different. It didn't seem like a practical joke. If it was, how many people were in on it?
Ah yes when you do it it's a practical joke but when I do it I am a proven liar.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThat sounds like something Roman would say.
Because you have nothing of substance to post here you would rather try to discredit both me and Romans with dishonesty by saying we are the same person. Right out of the trolling handbook.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerThis is your game:
So does that mean FMF is also a proven liar with his multiple accounts? By the way, if my intention was to deceive, why would I have told you I was FMJ and how would you have know for sure if I hadn't told you? You seem to be sure that I am Romans and you're wrong.
You were exposed as fetchmyjunk and 'admitted it.' This is 'NOT' the same as voluntarily telling people you had switched accounts. (You were left with no choice due to your identity being blown. You then publicly apologized for deliberately misleading people).
Despite this, you cling to the argument that if you hadn't told people then they wouldn't know. (This is 'incorrect' as your second identity had been blown and there was no denying it). - To prove a point, you created a third account (Roman) and this time refused to admit it was you, even when it was blatantly obvious, so as to prove that if you don't tell people nobody can prove it.
The problem is, this has required prolonged deception and multiple bare-faced lies which has now gone on for far too long. You can no longer turn round and claim you were merely proving a point as the deception has been too large and will discredit you profoundly with no comeback. It would also shine a light on other abuses that have been going on. (You know to what I refer).
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeAssuming for a moment I was Romans (which I'm not), how would you prove that I was?
This is your game:
You were exposed as fetchmyjunk and 'admitted it.' This is 'NOT' the same as voluntarily telling people you had switched accounts. (You were left with no choice due to your identity being blown. You then publicly apologized for deliberately misleading people).
Despite this, you cling to the argument that if you hadn't told p ...[text shortened]... It would also shine a light on other abuses that have been going on. (You know to what I refer).
1 edit
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeThis sounds like something Dive would say. Are you Dive? 🙄
That sounds like something Roman would say.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou have already made a number of errors, that more than one poster has picked up on, where you have gotten confused between your accounts. This was always going to happen as trying to maintain 2 separate accounts was always going to be difficult.
Assuming for a moment I was Romans (which I'm not), how would you prove that I was?
In short, 'you' yourself will make it abundantly clear you are deceiving people. All we have to do is sit back and watch the car crash.
And it was never about 'us' having to prove your deception. It was about 'you' being an honest member of the community from the outset, without having to be uncovered.