I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
@mchill saidTrillions of trillions of prayers to thousands of gods over thousands of years and every one of these religions is "the Answer , the True Religion " .
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
And the response is zero , zip and nada .
Wake up . There is no interactive supreme being .
@mchill saidDid you buy the book? Can you give one of the arguments? [I didn't see any on the linked page.]
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
3 edits
@mchill said@mchill, I read the article and it was Ann Shakespeare's experience of an overnight change that interested me.
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
I don't believe that quantum physics proves the existence of God as some bronze-age desert-dwelling psycho-projecting idolators of Earth imagined him, but I do believe that things are connected funny behind the scenes.
Of course I have heard of quantum entanglement experiments, but as a control, shouldn't the scientists have checked first to make sure that all "particles" everywhere were not already entangled?
I don't believe that quantum physics proves the existence of God as some bronze-age desert-dwelling psycho-projecting idolators of Earth imagined him, but I do believe that things are connected funny behind the scenes.
Would you clarify what you mean by "psycho-projecting idolators" ?
I am kind of assuming you are referring to Yahweh in the 39 books of the Tanak or "Old Testament".
Perhaps you could start by explaining - if the God of Israel was an idol how come He utters so much against idolatry? In the incident with the golden calf, the idol that the Isrealites made while Moses delayed on the mountain with God, are you saying God was one idol and the golden calf was the other?
@mchill saidIf there is a creator, then aren't the expanding frontiers of knowledge that scientists are exploring simply going to result in knowing more about that creator's work and how the work works, regardless of whether the scientists are athiests, agnostics, deists or theists?
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
@mchill saidDo you think science and Christianity are at odds?
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
@mchill said“... this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.”
I'm not yet ready to jump on the "quantum physics proves the existence of God" bandwagon, but this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.
I find it interesting that since the dawn of our digital age, the scientific world seems to be moving closer to explaining the workings of the universe in much more scriptural terms.
https://www.thelondoneconomic.com/opinion/bringing-a-quantum-shift-to-christian-prayer-and-worship/04/07/
Name three.
@great-king-rat saidThis forum doesn't do "arguments" anymore.
“... this book makes some pretty good arguments for it.”
Name three.
@fmf saidYes, this is true, as long as the religionists aren't hard-set, like concrete, in their insistence that God just went around waving some kind of magic wand at everything. I like to call this "Poofism". There's simply no evidence that God did not simply use the laws of physics that he created to bring about his will.
If there is a creator, then aren't the expanding frontiers of knowledge that scientists are exploring simply going to result in knowing more about that creator's work and how the work works, regardless of whether the scientists are athiests, agnostics, deists or theists?
1 edit
@bigdoggproblem said1. Quantum Mechanics is one of the most successful, well-verified scientific theories.
This forum doesn't do "arguments" anymore.
2. Quantum Mechanics is often mysterious and counter-intuitive.
3. So is my god / belief / religion.
C. Since both Quantum Mechanics and my god / belief / religion have similar properties, they must also share the property of being valid.
