Originally posted by Starrman I'm sure he's seen it and is constructing a devious and malevolent rebuttal as we speak.
Reading this thread, I surmise that most of you disagree with No1's crusade against engine abuse. Have I misunderstood something? Do you approve of playing against engines?
Originally posted by ivangrice Reading this thread, I surmise that most of you disagree with No1's crusade against engine abuse. Have I misunderstood something? Do you approve of playing against engines?
No, I just think he's an a$$hole. And I should know since I'm not the most pleasant-smelling orifice around either...
Originally posted by ivangrice Reading this thread, I surmise that most of you disagree with No1's crusade against engine abuse. Have I misunderstood something? Do you approve of playing against engines?
Not at all, what makes you think that? I actually quite like him.
Originally posted by ivangrice Reading this thread, I surmise that most of you disagree with No1's crusade against engine abuse. Have I misunderstood something? Do you approve of playing against engines?
You're far to civil and logical to be hanging around in here .
Originally posted by Jay Peatea Jay Peatea goes into a trance, a strange twangy voice emerges from his mouth :-
You lot you're all chuffing cheaters, it occured to me that by the nature of the internet that you are all using computers to play chess, so I've analysis all your games and my result are 100% conclusive
1) e4 e5 100% match with fritz,
Bunch of blooming cheaters. ...[text shortened]... t breachs the TOS, gulp, cor blimey its hot down ereeeeeee....
Jay peatea slumps in chair
appears to have been no1m's great good fortune to have been rehosted in an Aussie, perhaps rather farther down under than he would have wished ...
Originally posted by Bosse de Nage I think the hard thing to grasp is that this thread--Darvlay's comment in particular--is a tribute to the late lamented.