Originally posted by KellyJay
What do you suggest people us to influence morality, science, religion,
something else, or do you think morality is beyond influence? What are your
views on the topic?
Kelly
My apologizes; didn't quite get your meaning the first time-
Science and religion no doubt influences people's moral beliefs, but I believe both science and religion nearly always does so irrationally.
I do not believe either science nor religion can rationally tell us anything whatsoever about what our moral beliefs
ought to be for there is not such thing as a “correct” or “incorrect” moral belief.
Not long ago I believed that the concept of morally right and wrong was so subjective as to be “meaningless” ( but, without having to condone acts of evil -to say that there is “no wrong” does not logically imply that it is “right” to do X , and we can still rationally choose to 'behave' ourselves and be altruistic for emotion reasons -nothing 'wrong' with doing something purely for an emotional reason short of choosing to delude yourself I think) .
But now I have changed my views a bit (mainly do to philosophy discussions with my brother who is a brilliant professor in philosophy (and currently teaching) and who is lot cleverer than I am) because I think morality being totally subjective does NOT make it “meaningless” so it is logically OK to talk about “right” and “wrong” in the moral context (but the rest of my beliefs on this matter stay exactly the same as before).
So I now think there IS a “morally right” and “morally wrong” but it is like beauty in the sense that it is totally subjective. It is also very emotionally based.
I also think that a tendency for most/all people to have moral belief X does not make X any less subjective just as, hypothetically, if everyone believed vanilla flavour to be better than strawberry flavour then that still would not make it any less subjective -I do not think a universal tendency to believe something is a rational criteria for defining what is subjective and what isn't.