Originally posted by sonship
I don't know if I watched this particular video. But I got yesterday a good dose of Ron Wyatt videos on archeology.
I think you should realize that as soon as some atheist scientist can get his hands on the DNA from some cloth, he will come up with equally persuasive reasons why it cannot be the DNA of someone born of a virgin.
You know that RJ.
...[text shortened]... convince the world, that and the testimony of our living.
See [b] Second Peter 1:16-21. [/b]
That is an interesting question. What would the DNA of a virgin birth look like? I assume it would only include female type DNA and no male. I don't know if there was ever any such thing ever happening, that is to say, some kind of DNA analysis of one THOUGHT to be born of a virgin. That would be more like a clone. But even a clone would have male DNA so perhaps DNA analysis would show nothing. This is above my pay grade for sureπ
It would be somehow like making a viable human out of just the female egg with no sperm.
Has that ever been done in the labs? No idea. Maybe a google search...
Found this:
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2007/12/can_a_virgin_give_birth.html
They actually found some kid with no male genes but he had some kind of malformation of his head. Don't think you could call that viable even if he lives.
Hinds: This is how science works. I didn't just poo poo the idea of a virgin birth outright because I don't believe in the bible god.
If evidence comes up that supports you, it is there, we believe it. We are not stuck in the young Earth creationist groove forever like you.