1. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    28 Mar '15 00:352 edits
    Why does it mean that to be an atheist and a science person as well...................that you become dishonest.

    Its like as soon as the science person decides to be an atheist............that their intelligence is plucked from their body and they become instantly dishonest.

    Science shall never create life................( and why cant science create life?)

    Because life is not made of atoms.

    If life is not made of atoms how could it be possible to create life???????

    IT IS NOT POSSIBLE........and dishonest science cannot admit that.

    So there is a million silly scientists out there all trying to created life with atoms.
  2. Standard memberDeepThought
    Losing the Thread
    Cosmopolis
    Joined
    27 Oct '04
    Moves
    78570
    28 Mar '15 00:41
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Why does it mean that to be an atheist and a science person as well...................that you become dishonest.

    Its like as soon as the science person decides to be an atheist............that their intelligence is plucked from their body and they become instantly dishonest.

    Science shall never create life................( and why cant science create life ...[text shortened]... mit that.

    So there is a million silly scientists out there trying to created life with atoms.
    Scientific method involves empiricism. The authority that scientists take for their statements is experiment. If they are unable to create life that means that the notion that life can be created in a laboratory is unproven, although not refuted as it may become possible in the future. Your statement, that life is "more than just atoms", however, requires some justification. Why are we to believe that there is no purely material explanation for life?

    Just as an aside, if scientists were to create life in the laboratory then it would be a living thing creating a living thing. Which could hardly be described as abiogenesis, but would seem to confirm the theory of its possibility.
  3. SubscriberBigDoggProblem
    The Advanced Mind
    bigdogghouse.com/RHP
    Joined
    26 Nov '04
    Moves
    110979
    28 Mar '15 05:59
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Because life is not made of atoms.
    I nominate this for DumbAss Post of the Week. ®
  4. Standard membervivify
    rain
    Joined
    08 Mar '11
    Moves
    9780
    28 Mar '15 15:45
    From Dasa's RHP profile:

    * Important: Please ignore all of my public forum postings from about July10th 2010 back to the beginning of postings. (or in other words about the first 24 pages of postings) give or take a few.
    * It was not the current Dasa speaking at the time - but someone else.

    So which Dasa is currently communicating? Can you switch which of your personalities post on this forum? Is there one who's less irritating than the one before us?
  5. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    28 Mar '15 15:55
    Originally posted by vivify
    From Dasa's RHP profile:

    * Important: Please ignore all of my public forum postings from about July10th 2010 back to the beginning of postings. (or in other words about the first 24 pages of postings) give or take a few.
    * It was not the current Dasa speaking at the time - but someone else.

    So which Dasa is currently communicating? Can you switch whi ...[text shortened]... ur personalities post on this forum? Is there one who's less irritating than the one before us?
    This current Dasa is the one who proposed that all Muslim men in the world be executed.
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    28 Mar '15 16:07
    Originally posted by FMF
    This current Dasa is the one who proposed that all Muslim men in the world be executed.
    So that takes care of the men. I suppose he wants the women for himself🙂
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12697
    28 Mar '15 16:13
    Originally posted by BigDoggProblem
    I nominate this for DumbAss Post of the Week. ®
    Do you believe atoms are living?
  8. SubscriberFMF
    Main Poster
    This Thread
    Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    29835
    28 Mar '15 16:13
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    So that takes care of the men. I suppose he wants the women for himself🙂
    He said the women would have a chance to prove themselves and that the children would be spared.
  9. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    28 Mar '15 16:23
    Originally posted by FMF
    He said the women would have a chance to prove themselves and that the children would be spared.
    Ah, "Prove Themselves". In other words, convert and then Dasa gets to marry about 100 of them......
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12697
    28 Mar '15 16:30
    Originally posted by FMF
    This current Dasa is the one who proposed that all Muslim men in the world be executed.
    No one has yet proposed any reasonable method to deal with the problem of Muslim terrorism. Dasa only proposed this idea out of desperation in wanting to stop Muslim terrorism. I am sure he would settle for a less drastic approach if it could be shown to truly work.
  11. Joined
    24 Apr '10
    Moves
    14583
    28 Mar '15 16:391 edit
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Blablabla
    You are using the word dishonest the wrong way.
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12697
    28 Mar '15 19:22
    Originally posted by Great King Rat
    You are using the word dishonest the wrong way.
    Retractions of dishonest scientific papers rose 1,900% in nine years

    Studies suggest that a majority of papers are retracted due to deliberate falsification by researchers, rather than simple mistakes

    Fabrication is perhaps the most egregious and difficult-to-detect form of fraud, consisting of reporting completely made-up data. Zietman notes that reports of fabrication are incredibly difficult to investigate, as it often comes down to one researcher's word against another's.

    Falsification consists of either manipulating the methodology of the study in order to guarantee a certain result or of omitting or changing data after the completion of a study.

    http://www.naturalnews.com/044806_study_retractions_scientific_papers_academic_dishonesty.html
  13. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    29 Mar '15 14:42
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    [quote]Retractions of [b]dishonest scientific papers rose 1,900% in nine years

    Studies suggest that a majority of papers are retracted due to deliberate falsification by researchers, rather than simple mistakes

    Fabrication is perhaps the most egregious and difficult-to-detect form of fraud, consisting of reporting completely made-up data. Zietman n ...[text shortened]...
    http://www.naturalnews.com/044806_study_retractions_scientific_papers_academic_dishonesty.html[/b]
    Speaking of dishonest, here is a site called 'creation ministries' that should be your guide when you put out your bogus young Earth truly stupid video's:

    http://creation.com/arguments-we-think-creationists-should-not-use

    Maybe after reading all the words on this site you will come up with much better bogus young Earth creationist video's.
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    12697
    29 Mar '15 18:31
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Speaking of dishonest, here is a site called 'creation ministries' that should be your guide when you put out your bogus young Earth truly stupid video's:

    http://creation.com/arguments-we-think-creationists-should-not-use

    Maybe after reading all the words on this site you will come up with much better bogus young Earth creationist video's.
    Do you use that website for your guide to truth?
  15. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    30 Mar '15 00:56
    Originally posted by DeepThought
    Scientific method involves empiricism. The authority that scientists take for their statements is experiment. If they are unable to create life that means that the notion that life can be created in a laboratory is unproven, although not refuted as it may become possible in the future. Your statement, that life is "more than just atoms", however, requ ...[text shortened]... uld hardly be described as abiogenesis, but would seem to confirm the theory of its possibility.
    The answer is simple.

    Apparently according to science .......it took a mere accident for life to be created by a lightning flash and a puddle of primordial soup.

    So remember that science can imitate a flash and they have all the chemicals at hand.

    If a simple accident can create life .........then a thousand phd. scientists should be able to do it.

    And you cannot use the excuse that it took a long long time (because it didn't.....

    According to scientific theory ........It is suppose to have happened in an instant with that flash)

    It is evolution that is supposed to take a long long time (and not the appearance of life)

    So why hasn,t science created life (if a dumb accident can do it?)
Back to Top