20 Aug '15 09:13>2 edits
Hi vistesd,
I have just come across this thread and eagerly read all nine pages of it.
First of all, I really want to thank you, and congratulate you, for addressing this topic, it makes a welcome change from Noah and evolution!
Secondly, it is a pleasure to read your posts. Your clear thinking and erudite language is pure joy. Your patient responses to all posters is exemplary.
Because I fundamentally agree with everything you say, in particular your clear summaries, (as you did on the previous page and on page nine) it has helped me to organize my own thinking.
Not coming from Anglican but from Baptist and Pentacostal roots, I was encouraged to learn that Anglicans actually use the three pillars for understanding the scriptures. Fundamentalistic sola scriptura can be so destructive.
If there is one comment that I would like to add it is this: Somebody said once that God is not only bigger than we think, but bigger than we can think. For one thing, it must be obvious that God must be bigger than Christianity, because everything discussed in this thread so far relates to how Christians relate to, and interpret, their own sacred texts. But that is only a fraction of the humanity that God created. Maybe this refers to the "other sheep have I that are not of this fold" that Jesus spoke about?
Another thing: if God is love (agape), which we could write as God = Love, then it would be mathematically correct to say that wherever love is demonstrated or practiced, there is a bit of God in that interaction.
I really look forward to your study on Christian Universalism.
I have just come across this thread and eagerly read all nine pages of it.
First of all, I really want to thank you, and congratulate you, for addressing this topic, it makes a welcome change from Noah and evolution!
Secondly, it is a pleasure to read your posts. Your clear thinking and erudite language is pure joy. Your patient responses to all posters is exemplary.
Because I fundamentally agree with everything you say, in particular your clear summaries, (as you did on the previous page and on page nine) it has helped me to organize my own thinking.
Not coming from Anglican but from Baptist and Pentacostal roots, I was encouraged to learn that Anglicans actually use the three pillars for understanding the scriptures. Fundamentalistic sola scriptura can be so destructive.
If there is one comment that I would like to add it is this: Somebody said once that God is not only bigger than we think, but bigger than we can think. For one thing, it must be obvious that God must be bigger than Christianity, because everything discussed in this thread so far relates to how Christians relate to, and interpret, their own sacred texts. But that is only a fraction of the humanity that God created. Maybe this refers to the "other sheep have I that are not of this fold" that Jesus spoke about?
Another thing: if God is love (agape), which we could write as God = Love, then it would be mathematically correct to say that wherever love is demonstrated or practiced, there is a bit of God in that interaction.
I really look forward to your study on Christian Universalism.