Originally posted by @sonshipWhat kind of "general principle" might that be?
It is also possible that you intellectually oppose any evidence proposed up front on general principle.
Originally posted by @fabianfnasI agree with you, creation science is someone going about to prove a point.
Every creationist referring to science to prove their religion is a pseudo scientist.
Creationism is not science, but pseudo-science.
I guess with that, we can say evolutionary science is also going about to prove a point.
Originally posted by @kellyjayWhat "point" do you imagine biologists are attempting to prove?
I agree with you, creation science is someone going about to prove a point.
I guess with that, we can say evolutionary science is also going about to prove a point.
1 edit
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraEvolutionary science doesn't mean all biologists, but if they have a point to prove.
What "point" do you imagine biologists are attempting to prove?
Originally posted by @kellyjayWhat "point" do you think evolutionary biologists are attempting to prove?
Evolutionary science doesn't mean all biologists, but if they have a point to prove.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraWell if creation science are people trying to prove creation.
What "point" do you think evolutionary biologists are attempting to prove?
Than I say, evolutionary science are people trying to prove evolution.
Btw, if anyone doesn't understand the difference between evolution and the theory of evolution, consider the analogy with the difference between gravity and the theory of gravity. Gravity exists, and that's a fact. The theory tries to explain that fact,and scientists try to disprove the theory. That is part of how science works.
Originally posted by @kellyjayYou are unfortunately mistaken. Evolutionary biologists do not publish papers "trying to prove evolution."
Well if creation science are people trying to prove creation.
Than I say, evolutionary science are people trying to prove evolution.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraReally?
You are unfortunately mistaken. Evolutionary biologists do not publish papers "trying to prove evolution."
Originally posted by @apathistI believe in both creation and evolution don't have issues with anyone promoting their beliefs. When you start talking about specific points in either I will argue when I disagree.
Evolution is a fact. Do you mean the theory of evolution? Scientists are interested in testing the theory; they try to prove it wrong!
1 edit
Originally posted by @apathistI believe that the process is factual the claims made due to the process is where I disagree.
Evolution is a fact. Do you mean the theory of evolution? Scientists are interested in testing the theory; they try to prove it wrong!
Originally posted by @kellyjayReally.
Really?
Here is one recent preprint that was posted on the "quantitative biology" segment of the arXiv.org-e-print archive. The paper makes no attempt to "prove evolution."
https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04548
Originally posted by @kellyjayYou stated that scientists try to prove evolution, and that specific point is incorrect. Since you aren't arguing about it, according to you that means you don't disagree.
I believe in both creation and evolution don't have issues with anyone promoting their beliefs. When you start talking about specific points in either I will argue when I disagree.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraIf they are not attempting to prove a I am not talking about them.
Really.
Here is one recent preprint that was posted on the "quantitative biology" segment of the arXiv.org-e-print archive. The paper makes no attempt to "prove evolution."
https://arxiv.org/abs/1709.04548