subjective science

Originally posted by @kellyjay
Evolutionist know, they don't have to live by the demands they place on other schools of
thought, they just know.

Ke4lly, you regress. I'm embarrassed for you.

Originally posted by @sonship

Yes, you do. You must explain every step of your way. Unless lying is important for you.

Do you think that by saying this you are doing the scientific method a favor ?

Do you think that in the realm of scientific knowledge all explanations are not worthy to accept as the best ones because we do not yet have explanations for those expla ...[text shortened]... that the comparative size of our moon is uniquely related to the size of the planet that it orbits ?

There are over 650 trillion possible bridge hands, but play a game of bridge and you get one of them. Despite the astronomical odds against you ever getting that particular hand!

I'm sure my point went whoosh over your head. Our moon is as it is. That mere fact cannot be woo.

Originally posted by @apathist
So you are not good with logic. Good to know. [b]djbecker has poor logic skills. [/b]

You seemingly are good at using the ad hominem when you run out of ideas. Good to know.

Originally posted by @apathist
Ke4lly, you regress. I'm embarrassed for you.

No need your approval isn't required.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Do you agree that certain unprovable assumptions are made when analyzing a fossil and that this often involves circular reasoning, a lot of speculation, guess work, and a creative imagination?

No, I don't agree.

Of course you are free to deny the existence of the fossil record if it makes you uncomfortable.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
You seemingly are good at using the ad hominem when you run out of ideas. Good to know.

When you exhibit poor logic, it is no ad hominem to point that out. You reinforce my point here, btw.

Originally posted by @kellyjay
No need your approval isn't required.

Duh. And I didn't ask for your approval. I had responded to a post of yours that made a goofy point. Care to talk about that?

Originally posted by @apathist
Duh. And I didn't ask for your approval. I had responded to a post of yours that made a goofy point. Care to talk about that?

Ask what you will.

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
No, I don't agree.

Of course you are free to deny the existence of the fossil record if it makes you uncomfortable.

Then you need to educate yourself. I didn't say anything about the existence of a fossil record, I was talking specifically about the interpretation of said fossil record.

Originally posted by @apathist
When you exhibit poor logic, it is no ad hominem to point that out. You reinforce my point here, btw.

If what you are saying is true you would have no problem pointing out the supposed flaw in my logic.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
Then you need to educate yourself. I didn't say anything about the existence of a fossil record, I was talking specifically about the interpretation of said fossil record.

I am fairly certain that between the two of us, I am the more educated.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
If what you are saying is true you would have no problem pointing out the supposed flaw in my logic.

You would not understand.

Originally posted by @kazetnagorra
I am fairly certain that between the two of us, I am the more educated.

I don’t doubt that, you might just want to sharpen up a bit on the interpretation of fossils.

Originally posted by @dj2becker
I don’t doubt that, you might just want to sharpen up a bit on the interpretation of fossils.

You are indeed a fossil sir, but It really isn't our job to try and interpret you.

(Which are you going to cry, ad hominem or strawman? )

Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-duke
You are indeed a fossil sir, but It really isn't our job to try and interpret you.

(Which are you going to cry, ad hominem or strawman? )

Indeed you lack the creativity and imagination. 😉