Originally posted by moon1969
You mischaracterized the President's comments. He campaigned on not extending the Bush tax cuts on the wealthy and thus to go back to tax rates on the wealthy we had under Reagan/Clinton, and much less than we had under the Republican President Eisenhower, for example. Ofcourse, I guess you would call Reagan and Eisenhower socialists. My how the labels have changed. Fringe radical right-wingers like yourself have no clue.
You call it "not extending tax cuts" while the rest of us call it "raising taxes." I didn't mischaracterize anyone or anything.
I have gone to great lengths to apologize for injecting my opinon about Obama into this, and admitting that any posts in defense of Obama are directly my fault.
But after about a full page of FMF's derailing efforts, I need to get steer us back on task.
The question was asked specifically of CHRISTIANS -- with non-Christians invited also, to judge this as objectively as possible using a legal framework...
Issue at hand: "Is it acceptable for a CHRISTIAN--who abides under the 8th Commandment not to steal--to vote in support of a politician who promises to raise the tax rate on one group and not the other?" The argument was presented by RC Sproul, who says that raising the tax rate on one group and not another is "legalized theft" and a CHRISTIAN is breaking the 8th Commandment by voting in favor of such a practice.
Is RC Sproul wrong in his argument, and if so, why?
Since he is using Scripture as his premise, it logically follows that any argument against his conclusion should be contained directly in Scripture. We have already seen a couple of arguments using Scripture, that basically instruct Christians to pay taxes. I have further explained (as did RC) that the issue at hand isn't whether or not we are to pay taxes, because we ARE supposed to pay whatever taxes are legally owed. The issue, again, is whether or not we should
suppport laws that penalize one group in favor of another, through taxation.